Bombay High Court
SOU. REENA NITIN KALE THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NITIN MARUTRAO KALEversusSHRI. MURLIDHAR SADASHIV UDAWANT AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The interim application for stay was dismissed because the appeal had already been dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The High Court noted that First Appeal No. 111 of 2025 had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 06/03/2025. Consequently, the Interim Application No. 262 of 2025, which sought a stay of that dismissal, could not survive. The court therefore disposed of the interim application without granting any relief. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed beyond the procedural status of the appeal. The order was signed by the Registrar (Judicial-II) on 17/06/2026.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- interim application
- stay order
- want of prosecution
Judgment
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 23
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2025
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2025
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order
appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : DR. M.S. DESHPANDE
REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 17/06/2026
None Present
The office remark discloses that First Appeal
No. 111 of 2025 is dismissed for want of prosecution
vide the Hon’ble Court’s order dated 06/03/2025.
Hence, this Interim Application No. 262 of 2025 filed for
grant of stay does not survive and it is accordingly
disposed of.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)
sat-R(J-II)-17.06.2026
Checking your session…