Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JITENDRA SATYANARAYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant, Jitendra Satyanarayan Singh, filed an application for leave to appeal (Pvt.) (ST.) No. 435 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the applicant on the scheduled date of 6 January 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal on 13 January 2026. The applicant again failed to appear, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal for want of prosecution and also disposed of the accompanying interim application. The order was signed by Justice Sandeep V. Marne on 13 January 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when an applicant fails to appear and prosecute an application for leave to appeal?

Subjects

  • leave to appeal
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • non-appearance

Judgment

                           Neeta Sawant                                           6-ALP(ST)-435-2022.docx

                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) (ST.) NO. 435 OF 2022
                                                                   WITH
                                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2023


                           Jitendra Satyanarayan Singh                                 …..APPLICANT
                                     : VERSUS :
                           State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                 ….RESPONDENTS


                           None for the Applicant.
                           Mr. Shailesh S. Ghag, APP for State.




                                                                CORAM :       SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                                DATED :      13 JANUARY 2026.
                           P.C :


                           1)             On 6 January 2026, following order was passed :

                                     1) None appears for the Applicants.
                                     2) List the Application under caption ‘dismissal’ on 13 January 2026.


                           2)             Today again none appears for the Applicant. It appears that the
                           Applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the Application. The
                           Application for leave to appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
     NEETA
              Digitally
              signed by
              NEETA
              SHAILESH
     SHAILESH SAWANT
     SAWANT Date:
              2026.01.13
              15:34:13
              +0530
                           The Interim Application also stands disposed of.
         Digitally
         signed by
         NEETA
NEETA    SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT   Date:
         2026.01.13                                                        [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
         15:34:19
         +0530

                           _____________________________________________________________________________

                                                               PAGE NO. 1 of 1
                                                          TUESDAY, 13 JANUARY 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.