Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. PRASHANT SARJERAO FASALEversusCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND MEMBER, DISTRICT SELECTION COMITTEE, ZILLA PARISHAD, SINDHUDURG AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that, in view of the petitioner's age, the application for early hearing is allowed.

Summary

The petitioner, Prashant Sarjerao Fasale, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of a member (Respondent No.4) of the District Selection Committee of Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg. An interim application was filed seeking an early hearing of the petition. The Court considered the age of the petitioner as a factor in determining the need for expeditious disposal. Finding that the petitioner’s age warranted a prompt hearing, the Court allowed the interim application. Consequently, the writ petition was ordered to be listed for final hearing on 24 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be heard at an early date considering the petitioner's age

Subjects

  • appointment
  • early hearing
  • writ petition
  • age
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • selection committee

Judgment

                                                                                  49-wp-7023-2015.doc

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                            WRIT PETITION NO.7023 OF 2015
                                                         WITH
                                         INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2919 OF 2022

                        Prashant Sarjerao Fasale          …..Petitioner
                               Vs.
                        Chief Executive Officer & Member,
                        District Selection Committee,
                        Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg & Ors. …..Respondents

                        Mr. Shantanu Patil, i/b. Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Dhridhar Patil (Through VC), for the Respondent No.1.
                        Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP, for the Respondents-State.

                                                   CORAM: MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,
                                                           RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
                                                    DATED: 4th MARCH 2026
                        P.C.:-

                        1.       This application is filed by the Petitioner for early hearing of

                        Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No,.4. The

                        Writ Petition is admitted on 20th July 2018.


                        2.       Considering the age of Petition, the application is allowed.


                        3.       List the Writ Petition on 24th March 2026, for final hearing.



                        (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.03.04
           19:05:45
           +0530        Gaikwad RD                                                                 1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.