Bombay High Court
RAMESH BUILDERS THR RAMESH NANJI THAKKAR PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF RAMESH BUILDERversusDHARMENDRA LABHSHANKAR VORA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS.1.1 BHADRA DHAMENDRA VORA AND ORS.(Deceased)
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
- Bench
- SHARMILA U DESHMUKH
Holding
The court held that the 14‑day delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
Summary
The applicant, Ramesh Builders, filed an appeal 14 days beyond the prescribed period and moved an interim application seeking condonation of the delay. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court examined the short duration of the delay and, finding no prejudice, decided to condone it. Consequently, the interim application was allowed, permitting the appeal to proceed. No substantive merits of the appeal were addressed in this order.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 14 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- appeal
- interim application
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:6505
30 IA-3151-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3151 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL (St.) NO. 2669 OF 2026
Ramesh Builders ...Applicant
Versus
Dharmendra Labhshankar Vora (since deceased,
through LRs) and Others ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Jash B. Vyas for Applicant/Org. Appellant.
Mr. Anuj Pande for Respondent No. 2(a)(ii).
Ms. Jaymala Ostwal for Respondent No. 2(b) (through VC).
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28th APRIL, 2026
P. C. :
1. Interim Application has been preferred seeking condonation of
delay of 14 days caused in preferring the present Appeal.
2. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent does not fairly
oppose the application, considering the duration of delay.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 14 days is
condoned.
4. Interim Application is allowed.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Sairaj 1 of 1
Checking your session…