Bombay High Court

Transvision Shipping Pvt LtdversusTransinterocean Co Ltd

Decided: 6 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: AMIT BORKAR

Holding

The Court may correct its order to reflect the intended relief and directed the corrected order to be uploaded.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay entertained an application to correct certain typographical and substantive errors in its order dated 6 August 2026 relating to Interim Application No. 3791 of 2026 in Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 153 of 2026. The petitioner, Transvision Shipping Pvt Ltd, sought to replace the word “writ” with “Commercial Arbitration”, insert a clause acknowledging the undertakings recorded in the consent terms, and amend paragraphs concerning the de‑freeze order and the scope of interim relief. The Court examined the proposed amendments and found no substantive prejudice, allowing the corrections to reflect the true intent of the original order. Consequently, the Court ordered the specific paragraph modifications and directed that the corrected order be uploaded. The corrected order now stands as the operative decree in the arbitration proceedings.

Issues considered

Whether the Court may amend its own order to correct typographical and minor substantive errors without a fresh hearing

Subjects

Commercial Arbitration
Interim Relief
Order Correction
Civil Procedure

Judgment

                                                  78-IA-3791-26+ SPM.doc



                                                              Sayali



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
            ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION


       INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3791 OF 2026
                       IN
 COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 153 OF 2026


Transvision Shipping Pvt Ltd                  … Petitioner
           V/s.
Transintercocean Co Ltd                       … Respondents

Mr. Gauraj Shah with Santosh Upadhyay and Ms.
Deepti Upadhyay, Harjot Signgh, for Applicant.
Mr. Nakul Jain with Ms. Apurva Mehta (Pohonerkar),
Mr. Anuj Hande, for original Petitioner.
Mr. Agam Shaikh, for Respondent no. 3.


                           CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                           DATED      : AUGUST 11, 2026
P.C.:

1.      Not on Board. Upon mentioning taken on board for the
speaking to the minutes order dated 06th August, 2026.

2.      In paragraph 1, the word deleted       ‘writ’   and be
substituted with ‘Commercial Arbitration’ .

3.      In paragraph no 2, the words be added “The
undertakings of      the applicant/original    respondent in



                                1
                                                78-IA-3791-26+ SPM.doc


commercial arbitration petition no.153 of 2026 as recorded
in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings to this
Court.”

4.   Paragraph no. 5 be corrected and read as “ The order of
de-freeze stands confirmed”.

5.   Paragraph no. 6 be corrected and read as “The ad-
interim relief granted by this Court in terms of prayer clause
(a) in Interim Application No.3791 of 2026.”

6.   Rest of the order remains unaltered.

7.   Order dated 06th August, 2026 be corrected and
uploaded accordingly.


                                          (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.