Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
196 judgments · newest first · showing 1–196
The petitioners sought relief against the Minister’s orders cancelling mutation entries and setting aside a sale of Mahar Watan land that had been transferred without the Collector’s prior sanction. The dispute centered on whether the 2002 amendment inserting Section 5(4) into the Bombay Inferior …
The petitioner, Chhaya Kashinath Shinde, challenged the order rejecting her appeal against an eviction under Section 3E of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, alleging that no sale, gift, lease or other transfer of her allotted rehabilitation flat had …
The Registrar noted that the sole respondent in a first appeal had died and that notice to the respondent was returned unserved as "dead". Under Chapter VII Rule 6 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, an appeal must be abated if the heirs of a deceased party are not brought on record …
The Registrar noted that the sole respondent in a first appeal had died and that notice to the respondent was returned unserved as "dead". Under Chapter VII Rule 6 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, an appeal must be abated if the heirs of a deceased party are not brought on record …
The petitioners filed an interim application (No. 2456 of 2023) in a writ petition originally filed in 2015. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the earlier application had already been served and that no substantive issues remained for adjudication in the present application. The …
The petitioner, Shree Subhash Hasuji Pedhavi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel repeatedly sought adjournments, despite the Court’s order on 13 July 2026 that no further adjournments would be granted and that …
The petitioners, Samaj Shikshan Mandal & Ors. and Ghodake Dattatray Nivrutirao & Ors., filed a writ petition (WP/12004/2016) and a contempt petition (CP/239/2017) before the Bombay High Court. Both petitions sought relief against the respondents, but subsequently the petitioners applied for …
The petitioners, Samaj Shikshan Mandal & Ors. and Ghodake Dattatray Nivrutirao & Ors., filed a writ petition (WP/12004/2016) and a contempt petition (CP/239/2017) before the Bombay High Court. Both petitions sought relief against the respondents, but subsequently the petitioners applied for …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking an order directing a charitable trust to conduct elections for its Managing Committee as per the Trust Deed, which stipulates a three‑year term. The respondents submitted that elections had already been held and the term of the Committee had subsequently …
The appellant filed first appeals (Nos. 1052/2015, 1053/2015, 1054/2015) challenging a judgment and award dated 5 March 2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, which granted additional compensation. The High Court of Bombay admitted the appeals and issued procedural …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The case concerned the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Pune, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Officer’s award (Rs.40,000‑Rs.46,000 per hectare) was far below market value and sought a rate of …
The case involved a group of land acquisition appeals concerning Village Parhar (Khurd) in Pune, acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was far below market value and sought a rate of Rs.3,68,000 per hectare, …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The case concerned the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Pune, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Officer’s award (Rs.40,000‑Rs.46,000 per hectare) was far below market value and sought a rate of …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The case concerned the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Pune, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Officer’s award (Rs.40,000‑Rs.46,000 per hectare) was far below market value and sought a rate of …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Taluka Bhor, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs.40,000‑46,000 per hectare) …
The case concerned the acquisition of agricultural lands in Village Parhar (Khurd), Pune, for the Neera Deoghar Project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Officer’s award (Rs.40,000‑Rs.46,000 per hectare) was far below market value and sought a rate of …
The Executive Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Department filed an interim application seeking condonation of a delay of five years and 295 days in filing an appeal against a Reference Award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court examined the applicant’s explanation for …
The Executive Engineer, Hetvane Canal Division, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a delay of nearly five years in filing an appeal against a Reference Award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court noted that the award was dated 22 March 2018, yet the …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Land Acquisition, filed First Appeal No. 215 of 2019 against Hasuram Jagannath Patil and others. During the pendency of the appeal, two interim applications (Nos. 10681 and 10683 of 2025) were filed. The Court, after considering the reasons …
This order was passed by the Bombay High Court in a batch of first appeals and connected interim applications. The main matter is First Appeal (ST) No. 3440 of 2018 filed by the State of Maharashtra against Parshuram Gopinath Gadge, since deceased through legal heirs Chandrabai Parshuram Gadge, and …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquired land in Ghoti village for a road project and fixed compensation via an award under Section 11. The claimants, dissatisfied with the compensation, filed a reference under Section 18, seeking a higher …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer acquired land in Ghoti village for a road project under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and fixed compensation via an award under Section 11. The claimants challenged the compensation, filing a reference under Section 18, and the Reference Court …
A. Doshi and Co. filed an interim application seeking restoration of their writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant's counsel, Minal Chandnani, was absent in the morning session, and later her instructed advocate, Rajesh Ranglani, appeared to inform the Court that Chandnani was …
The petitioners, MSEDC Ltd, supplied electricity to the respondent's milk centre on the basis that it would be used for milk processing and thus attracted an industrial tariff. An inspection in 2017 revealed that the premises were only being used as a milk collection, storage and transport centre, …
The State Electricity Distribution Co. issued a provisional assessment bill to M/s Delight Bakery after a Flying Squad inspection found that the bakery, which had obtained an industrial‑category electricity connection, was also selling bakery products on the premises. The petitioner argued that this …
The petitioners, a group of temporary and casual workers of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, sought review of a judgment that denied them any continuing right of employment under Clause 4 of a 2002 circular. They argued that the clause guaranteed their right to remain in post even if …
The petitioner, a senior liaison officer employed by Patil Construction, claimed he was a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and was illegally terminated orally on 24 July 2017 without any statutory procedure or domestic inquiry. He alleged that he was paid a reduced salary of …
The petitioners, former junior engineers of Pune Municipal Corporation, challenged their termination on 19 March 2011, alleging it violated an interim order dated 30 July 2010 issued by the Industrial Court which required the corporation to keep them in service until duly selected candidates joined. …
The petitioners, former employees of Alicon Castalloy Ltd., challenged their termination on grounds of alleged submission of a forged B.A. certificate. They argued that the departmental enquiry denied them the right to be represented by a lawyer, relied on an unexamined handwriting expert report, …
The petitioner, a former peon of Shri Sadguru Jangli Maharaj Bank, claimed unfair labour practice and was granted permanency in 2001. He was terminated in 1999 and later sought reinstatement with back wages, but the Labour Court ordered reinstatement without back wages or, alternatively, …
The petitioners, former employees of Alicon Castalloy Ltd., challenged their termination on grounds of alleged submission of a forged B.A. certificate. They argued that the departmental enquiry denied them the right to legal representation, relied on an unexamined handwriting expert report, and …
The petitioners, Sayali Deepak Upasani Employees Provident Fund Organisation, challenged an order dated 2 November 2016 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (EPFAT) which imposed damages under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. The …
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) challenged an Industrial Court order that partially allowed a complaint by senior audit employee Sudha Ramesh Shelar, while Shelar sought relief from a compulsory retirement notice issued when she turned 55. The employee had been promoted in 2010 …
The petitioner, employed as a watchman since 2003, was terminated in 2018 after a long period of continuous service. He challenged the termination, alleging it was arbitrary, constituted an unfair labour practice, and that the employer failed to prove any legal basis such as age limits or vacancy …
The petitioner, a former director of M/s Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the legality of a 2022 order of the Industrial Court that dismissed his revision application against a criminal complaint alleging breach of a 2004 labour court order. The criminal complaint was filed in 2005 for …
The petitioner, a former director of M/s Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the legality of a 2022 order of the Industrial Court that dismissed his revision application against a criminal complaint alleging breach of a 2004 labour court order. The criminal complaint was filed in 2005 for …
The petitioners, former clerical employees of Sahitya Ratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation Ltd., challenged a Labour Court award dated 28 December 2023 which found their termination illegal but granted only a nominal lump‑sum compensation. They argued that their appointments, …
The petitioners, former clerical employees of Sahitya Ratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation Ltd., challenged a Labour Court award dated 28 December 2023 which found their termination illegal but granted only a nominal lump‑sum compensation. They argued that their appointments, …
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (petitioners) challenged the Industrial Court's order that reinstated a former employee (respondent) and corrected his date of birth in the service record. The respondent had signed his service book showing a birth date of 2 June 1952 but later claimed his …
The petitioners, former clerical employees of Sahitya Ratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation Ltd., challenged a Labour Court award dated 28 December 2023 which found their termination illegal but granted only a nominal lump‑sum compensation. They argued that their appointments, …
The petitioners, former clerical employees of Sahitya Ratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe Development Corporation Ltd., challenged a Labour Court award dated 28 December 2023 which found their termination illegal but granted only a nominal lump‑sum compensation. They argued that their appointments, …
The petitioners challenged a recovery certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, alleging that they were falsely shown as guarantors for several working capital overdraft facilities of Konark Urban Cooperative Bank and that the bank’s documents were forged. They claimed …
The petitioners challenged a recovery certificate issued on 18 November 2019 by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ulhasnagar, alleging that they were falsely shown as guarantors for Working Capital Overdraft facilities of Konark Urban Cooperative Bank and that the bank’s documents were …
The petitioners challenged a recovery certificate issued on 18 November 2019 by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ulhasnagar, alleging that they were falsely shown as guarantors for Working Capital Overdraft facilities of Konark Urban Cooperative Bank and that the bank’s documents were …
The petitioners challenged a recovery certificate issued by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, alleging that they were falsely shown as guarantors for several working capital overdraft facilities of Konark Urban Cooperative Bank and that the bank’s documents were forged. They claimed …
The petitioner, Maki Homi Chibber, challenged the order of the District Deputy Registrar (respondent No.2) that granted a certificate of unilateral deemed assignment of lease to respondent No.3 under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. The dispute arose from a complex chain of title …
The petition challenged a order passed under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 that deemed respondent No.3 a member of a cooperative housing society after the society failed to decide on his membership application within the prescribed period. The society argued that …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an interim application filed by Padmaja Jadhav and others in Writ Petition No. 274 of 2013, filed by Narayanrao Raosaheb Jadhav against Sahyadri Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. and others. The court, after hearing counsel for the applicants and the State, …
The petitioner, Gayatri Dham Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No representative appeared for the petitioner. The court noted that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. No substantive …
The petitioners, Rising Landscape Association and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. They later submitted written instructions to withdraw the writ petition, seeking liberty to pursue the same grievance through a civil suit. The …
In a writ petition filed by Sayali Technocraft Industries India Ltd against Deepak Upasani, the State of Maharashtra and others, the parties consented to set aside the impugned order. The High Court, by order dated 23 April 2026, set aside the challenged order and made the rule absolute as per …
The petitioners, Garlick Engineering Ltd (formerly a division of Empire Industries Ltd), filed interim applications seeking the withdrawal of Rs. 25 lakh deposited pursuant to an order dated 22 April 2019 and the return of bank guarantees issued under that order. The respondents indicated an …
The applicant, Kiran Chandrakant Kulkarni, filed Criminal Application No. 168 of 2013 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The application was presented without any supporting documents or evidence. The court examined …
The petitioners challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Thane, which had allowed the impleadment of 44 additional respondents in a complaint concerning the discontinuation of manufacturing activities in 1986. The petitioners argued that the original complaint itself was untimely and that a …
The petitioners, long‑serving employees, applied for pension under the Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 on the basis of the joint option for higher wages. EPFO rejected their applications, citing the employer’s failure to produce required documents such as Form 6A and challans. The petitioners argued …
The petitioners, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its officials, challenged an Industrial Court order that had upheld the suspension of employee Suresh Kadam and treated the suspension period as leave, alleging that the suspension and subsequent fine of Rs.5,000 were illegal and …
The petitioners, cooperative housing societies, challenged orders granting deemed conveyance of land and common areas by the District Deputy Registrar under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. They argued that conveyance should be deferred until the entire multi‑phase project was completed or …
The petitioners, a facility management company, challenged a 2019 Industrial Court order that found them guilty of an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and directed payment of …
Shripad Appsaheb Bhosale filed a writ petition (No. 828 of 2015) against the State of Maharashtra. An earlier petition dated 4 December 2023 had been dismissed for non‑prosecution and later restored by the court. On the present date, the petitioner failed to appear before the bench and indicated a …
The writ petition arose from a dispute between Sushilabai Raghunath Wani and Shakuntalabai over CL-III Licence No.24, which was originally held by a partnership between Raghunath and Manohar and later continued by Sushilabai and her son, with an agreement that the late Pandit Thorat (Wani) was …
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their interim relief application and a stay order against a disqualification order of the housing society's managing committee under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The High Court noted concerns about the procedure of the original order and …
The petitioners, members of Matsyaghandha Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Minister dated 12 September 2014 that de‑registered their society, alleging that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 21‑A of the Maharashtra …
The petitioners were charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of a teacher, Shivaji Gade, following a departmental inquiry that allegedly humiliated him. They contended that the prosecution evidence did not establish any act of …
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. Petitioner No. 1 appeared in person and claimed to have authority to withdraw the petition on behalf of all three petitioners. He stated that the dispute underlying the petition had been amicably resolved by the parties. …
M/s Vishal Enterprises applied for a further extension of time to deposit 10% of the assessed amount, a pre‑condition for obtaining a stay. The High Court had previously extended the deadline to 30 April 2025 and subsequently to 30 June 2025. The present application seeks another extension, citing …
The petitioner, Krantikari Kamgar Union, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 13 December 2023 and an award dated 30 November 2019 concerning back wages. The respondents submitted an affidavit dated 3 September 2025 along with Exhibit “A” …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and subsequently filed a praecipe seeking its withdrawal. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The Court, however, directed that the substantive contentions raised in the petition may be pursued …
The Thane Municipal Transport Undertaking filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners amicably resolved their dispute with the heirs and legal representatives of respondent No.13. A Consent Minutes of Order was filed, recording that two cheques totaling …
The petitioner, a permanent worker, was dismissed after a disciplinary enquiry that alleged he had hidden 49 items, including a half‑sleeve apron, in a locker purportedly allocated to him. The Labour Court upheld the enquiry and dismissed him, but the petitioner challenged the Part‑I and Part‑II …
The petitioner, Momin Zulfikar Kasam, challenged a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance granted by the Competent Authority to respondent No.1 (Apurva Lok Rachna Co‑op. Housing Society) for a portion of land under Wing C4 of Building No.3, alleging that the application was inconsistent with …
The petitioners, owners of six commercial units in the Silver Utopia building, challenged the legality of orders passed by the District Registrar of Cooperative Societies and the Deputy Registrar, alleging that they had already paid maintenance charges to a private agency and that the cooperative …
The petitioner, a member of a co‑operative housing society, claimed entitlement to a newly constructed flat (Flat No. 703) as permanent alternate accommodation after redevelopment, alleging that the developer and the society wrongfully handed possession of the flat to the petitioner's son, a …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 8 July 2022 issued by the District Magistrate under Rule 107‑11(d‑1)(vi) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. The Court examined whether such an order, deemed executionary and devoid of discretionary power, could be subject to judicial review …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, filed a writ petition seeking correction of specific numerical figures and a table entry in the judgment dated 24 March 2026 concerning land area measurements approved by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The petition alleged that the original …
The Pushpa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed writ petitions challenging the admission of a respondent as a member on the ground that the premises in question did not qualify as a "flat" under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The respondent relied on a civil court judgment (L.C. Suit …
The petitioner, Momin Zulfikar Kasam, challenged a Certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance granted by the Competent Authority to respondent No.1 (Apurva Lok Rachna Co‑op. Housing Society) for a portion of land under Wing C4 of Building No.3, alleging that the application was inconsistent with …
The petitioners challenged three orders of attachment issued by a cooperative credit society, asserting ownership and borrowing rights over the property. The Court examined the procedural framework under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961, which mandates that objections to …
The petition arose from a development agreement executed in 2005 granting K & K Developers rights over certain survey lands. The Collector of Pune, exercising powers under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963, issued orders in 2006 permitting change of user and residential …
The petitioner, Garden Court Cooperative Housing Society, sought a deemed conveyance of 4,464 sq m of land under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963, after the developer failed to transfer title despite the society’s formation in 2011. The developer had obtained a revised …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court issued a notice on 12 August 2025, but the petitioners' counsel had expired and they failed to engage new representation. Despite the notice, the petitioners …
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition alleging that he had submitted a No Objection to the respondents but thereafter received no further response. He claimed that the respondents failed to appear or act upon the No Objection. The court examined whether the petition could proceed in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition arising out of the proceedings of a no‑confidence motion that took place in 2014. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Bombay. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication given that the no‑confidence motion had already been …
The petition concerned a retirement dispute that had been decided by a School Tribunal in 2011, granting retirement to the respondent. By the time of the writ petition, both the petitioner and respondent had already retired, leaving no substantive issue for the court to consider. The court observed …
The petitioner, a member of a Village Panchayat, was disqualified by the Collector under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 on the ground of having more than two children, and the Collector also ordered criminal prosecution. The petitioner challenged the order, alleging …
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition challenging a disqualification arising from a 2009 election. The petition was filed in 2026, more than a decade after the election. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable given the considerable lapse of time. It held that …
The petitioners, Sayali and Jagannath Damu Kad, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The respondents, including Deepak Upasani and others, communicated a change of their advocate, which was recorded as document ‘X’. Despite the change of counsel, no representative of the petitioners …
The petition challenges an order dated 12 September 2007 by the revisional authority that entertained a revision application filed on 19 October 2002, nearly eight years after a consolidation scheme was modified under the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition arising out of a 2012 no‑confidence motion. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. It held that the underlying proceedings were concluded, leaving no matter to be decided. Consequently, the petition was declared infructuous. The Court …
The petitioners sought relief against an order directing the holding of elections, which was issued in 2006. The elected body's tenure was three years, and that period has since expired. The court noted that with the passage of time, there was no longer any operative issue to adjudicate. …
The petition was filed challenging an interim order that stayed the Registrar's order issued under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners feared that the Society's Managing Committee was making policy decisions, specifically the appointment of a developer, …
Petitioner Sayali Deepak Bacchav filed Writ Petition No. 2232 of 2013 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S. H. Kankal, Advocate General of the State. The …
The petitioner obtained permission under Rule 17(2) of the Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Revenue Administration Rules, 1972 to purchase land, executed a sale deed and secured a mutation entry in his name. Two years later, a respondent sought cancellation of the mutation alleging an earlier …
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak Upasani, filed Writ Petition No. 4153 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court against the District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies Mumbai City 1 and others. No grounds or supporting documents were filed by the petitioner. The respondents, represented by counsel, raised …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2013 seeking the State Government to decide an appeal within four weeks, as directed by the Court. By the date of this judgment in 2026, the stipulated period had long elapsed and the appeal should have been decided. The Court observed that there was nothing …
The petition concerned a retirement dispute that had been decided by a School Tribunal in 2011, granting retirement to the respondent. By the time of the writ petition, both the petitioner and respondent had already retired, leaving no substantive issue for the court to consider. The court observed …
A writ petition (No. 4182 of 2011) was filed by Sayali Deepak and others against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners sought relief but failed to advance any substantive cause of action. The court noted that no prosecution of the petition had been undertaken. Consequently, the Court …
The petitioner, M/s. Kunj Glass Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24 June 2008 in which the Competent Authority, exercising powers under Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, denied its request for documents and records that formed the basis of a …
Petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 4832 of 2013) before the High Court of Bombay. No pleadings were filed on behalf of the petitioners. The Court noted the absence of any pleadings and consequently dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by Justice Amit Borkar. No …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 4839 of 2013) arising out of the proceedings related to a no‑confidence motion in 2013. The High Court examined whether any substantive matter remained for adjudication. It observed that the underlying proceedings had been concluded and there was nothing …
The petitioners, Sayali Deepak and others, filed a writ petition against respondents Upasani and others in the Bombay High Court. The petition sought relief concerning the respondent's reinstatement, but the respondent was subsequently reinstated and the petitioner retired as Head Master, rendering …
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (petitioner) challenged an order by Respondent No.2 that limited its authority to issue electricity bills to a two‑year period and required civil suits for earlier periods. The petitioner argued that under the Electricity Act, 2003 it may issue …
The applicant, Shabnoor Ayub, filed a civil application (No. 2353 of 2008) before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared before the court for the hearing. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the civil application for want of prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition (No. 7320 of 2012) before the High Court of Bombay challenging proceedings related to a no‑confidence motion that took place in 2012. The petition sought relief on the basis that the earlier proceedings were allegedly flawed. The Court observed …
The petitioner, Deepa Bhosale, challenged an order of the State Information Commissioner issued under Sections 19(2) and 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which directed the initiation of departmental proceedings against a Public Information Officer for a delay in furnishing information. …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner communicated a desire to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel submitted the withdrawal communication to the court and sought permission for withdrawal. The court recorded the …
M/s. Praga Tools and Dies filed a writ petition (No. 11100 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and others. No pleadings or supporting documents were filed by the petitioner. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Charity Commissioner that required him to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the legal heirs of Shaheed Karkare for the registration of his trust. The petition was originally filed in 2012 but was only heard …
In the High Court of Bombay, an interim application (No. 1757 of 2026) was filed by the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner, Hari Vitthal Patil, against respondents Yashwant Shankar Pandit and others. The court, after considering the interim application, allowed it in accordance with the prayer …
Petitioner Sayali Deepak filed a writ petition (No. 391 of 2014) against M/s. Damos Trading Co Pvt Ltd and others. No supporting documents or evidence were filed. The Court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No further …
The petitioners, IDFC First Bank Ltd and others, claimed to be prior mortgagees and challenged an order dated 20 September 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate under Rule 107(d-1)(vi) of the MCS Rules. They argued that the order should not have been passed without giving them an …
The petitioner, a final inspector at SPM Auto Comp Systems, was suspended and later dismissed following a domestic enquiry that alleged his involvement in an assault on his superior, based largely on circumstantial evidence such as a telephone call and prior workplace friction. The Labour Court held …
The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization (the petitioner) filed a writ petition against Thane District Central Cooperative Bank (the respondent) seeking relief after a Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) order granted a waiver of the deposit of the assessed …
The petitioner Shabnoor Ayub challenged an order dated 9 December 2019 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal‑cumm‑Labour Court (CGIT‑II) that had set aside an earlier ex‑parte order dated 10 August 2017. The Tribunal had recalled the ex‑parte order on the basis that the respondents' advocate …
The petitioners, Krantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 21 June 2025 that rejected their interlocutory application for production of exemption certificates issued to M/s. Top Security Ltd under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of …
The petitioners, Krantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 21 June 2025 that rejected their interlocutory application for production of exemption certificates issued to M/s. Top Security Ltd under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of …
The petitioner, Mr. Narhari Bhimrao Handur Kulkarni, filed Writ Petition No. 3511 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. No counsel or representative appeared on the petitioner’s behalf on the scheduled hearing dates, including the most recent …
The petitioner, Atul Ganesh Kulkarni, sought to amend his pleadings in a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act by (i) introducing a statement of accounts, (ii) adding the legal heirs of a deceased defendant after abatement, and (iii) naming defendants who had not been …
The petitioner, Atul Ganesh Kulkarni, sought to amend his pleadings in a Section 91 proceeding under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act to (i) introduce a statement of accounts, (ii) add the legal heirs of a deceased defendant after abatement, and (iii) name defendants who had not been served …
The petitioner, Aalap Cooperative Housing Society, filed a writ petition under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, challenging an order passed against it. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by counsel. The society later informed the …
The petitioner, a federation of twelve housing societies, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the District Deputy Registrar's order rejecting its application for deemed conveyance of land in Sector 2 of the Srishti Complex. The Registrar had rejected the application on grounds that …
The petitioner cooperative housing society challenged a revision order that had directed it to admit a respondent as a member despite the respondent's claim being based on an unregistered agreement with the deceased member's heirs. The court examined whether the absence of a registered conveyance of …
The petitioners challenged a recovery action initiated by their cooperative society under Section 154-B(29) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, alleging that the society maintained two inconsistent sets of accounts which inflated their liability. They also contended that they had made …
The petitioners challenged a recovery order issued by a cooperative society under Section 154‑B(29) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, alleging that the society maintained two inconsistent sets of accounts which inflated their liability. They also contended that they had continued to make …
The applicant, Atul Ganesh Kulkarni, filed an interim application in the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.3111 of 2014 against respondents Mohan Pandurang Prabhu and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the record shows a note that no representation was made for the …
The Ruby Isle Cooperative Housing Society filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Deputy Registrar issued under Section 154B-27 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act that directed the society to delete penal charges from its accounts. The society had previously been ordered on 18 …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an interim application filed in Writ Petition No.5236 of 2011. The applicant sought relief as outlined in prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the application. The court, after considering the reasons set out in the application, allowed the interim relief sought. It …
The petitioner, a housing developer, challenged a November 2023 order of the Competent Authority that granted deemed conveyance of 4,652.26 sq m of land, including a recreation ground, to a co‑operative society (respondent 2) under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The …
The petitioners, Sarita Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Sheetal F Building Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the registration of a separate cooperative society for ten shops within the same building that they already governed. The building, G‑Sarita, comprises 56 residential flats …
The assessing officer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. held that respondent No.2 was misusing electricity supplied for IT purposes by engaging in commercial activities, allegedly exceeding the 20% commercial use limit under the ITES Policy, 2003, and invoked Section 126 of …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, a subset of the petitioners instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition, while the remaining petitioners did not give such instruction. The court was asked to determine the effect …
The petitioners (Shivnagar Vidya Prasarak Mandal and others) challenged a College Tribunal order that reinstated respondent No.1, a lecturer, with back wages. The court examined whether the respondent's temporary appointments, which were expressly conditional on university approval and limited to …
The petitioner, Nitin @ Sambhaji Sagaji Hagawane, filed a writ petition challenging a dispute concerning the Gram Panchayat for the year 2013. The dispute pertained to actions taken during the tenure of that Gram Panchayat. The court observed that the tenure of the Gram Panchayat had already …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a no‑confidence motion passed in 2013. The petition was filed after a considerable delay. The Court observed that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the petition could not be entertained on its merits. The writ …
M/s Interconnected Stock Exchange of India Ltd filed a writ petition (No. 7857 of 2011) before the High Court of Bombay challenging actions of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner sought relief but no counsel appeared on its behalf. The court noted the absence of …
Ashok Yashwantrao More filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against Maratha Vidhya Prasarak Samaj and others. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition should be entertained despite the delay. The Court …
M/s. Interconnected Stock Exchange of India Ltd filed a writ petition (No. 9943 of 2013) in the Bombay High Court against Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and another respondent. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition. …
The petitioners, Sarita Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Sheetal F Building Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the registration of a separate cooperative society for ten shops within the same building that they already governed. The building, G‑Sarita, comprises 56 residential flats …
The petitioners, members of a cooperative society's Managing Committee, challenged a June 24, 2024 order by the Deputy Registrar that disqualified them and barred their appointment for six months under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Registrar’s finding noted …
The petitioners filed writ petitions arising from an election petition filed in 2007. Because a considerable amount of time had elapsed, the court held that the petitions could no longer be entertained. No substantive merits were examined; the matter was disposed solely on the ground of delay. …
The petitioner, a teacher appointed in 1986 with S.S.C. and D.Ed., obtained a B.A. degree in 1991 and sought placement in the graduate pay scale, alleging seniority over a junior colleague who had been granted that scale. The junior teacher had earlier obtained a writ order placing her in the …
The petitioner, Kartik Regency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the Deputy Registrar's order rejecting its application for deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The Society claimed that the …
The petitioner, Vinayak Ashish Co-operative Hsg Society Ltd, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing, nor had any appearance been made on any prior occasion. The Court noted the absence of representation and …
The petitioners, cooperative banks under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, challenged a finding of the Revisional Authority that Section 154(2A) of the Act does not bar a revision against an attachment order issued under sub‑rule 11 of Rule 107. They argued that such a finding, if treated …
The petitioners, cooperative banks under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, challenged a finding of the Revisional Authority that Section 154(2A) of the Act does not bar a revision against an attachment order issued under sub‑rule 11 of Rule 107. They argued that such a finding, if treated …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, sought membership in a cooperative housing society based on a conveyance deed for a basement and parking area. The Appellate Authority granted membership, but the Revisional Authority set aside that order, holding that the premises did not qualify as a “flat” under …
The petitioner, The Greater Bombay Cooperative Bank Ltd., challenged an attachment order issued by a Special Recovery Officer under sub‑rule (19) of Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. The respondents had earlier obtained a stay on the attachment order through a revision …
The petitioner, Arihant Developers, challenged a deemed conveyance order issued by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, arguing that construction of the project was incomplete and that the order improperly granted rights over a portion of the land. A …
The petitioner, Shabnoor Ayub, claimed ownership of a flat and challenged a deemed conveyance order dated 18 May 1982 issued under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, alleging denial of a proper hearing. The respondent State argued that the petitioner had already executed a …
The petitioner, claiming ownership of a building on land declared as a slum, challenged the registration of a Slum Rehabilitation Authority cooperative society. He argued that because his father owned the structure, the society could not be registered. The court noted that the petitioner was not …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged the order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The dispute arose because the deceased father of the respondent had been treated as a member and had …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar that directed it to admit respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The society argued that private clauses in its construction and …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order made under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which appointed an Administrator after the disqualification of office bearers under Section 79A(3). The court observed that the petition only contested the …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged an order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member and issue a share certificate, alleging that the applicant lacked a document of title and that the society’s rules required a registered agreement. The dispute …
The Vinayak Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Limited filed an interim application (No. 638 of 2026) in Writ Petition No. 7202 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against respondents Laxmikant Hirji Raikundaliya and others. The application sought the grant of relief specified in …
Premium Tools Private Limited and others challenged a series of orders issued by the Assistant Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted recovery certificates. The petitioners argued that the Competent Authority had exceeded its jurisdiction because …
The petitioner, a custom clerk of 23 years, filed a writ petition challenging a 2019 order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal that dismissed his claim for reinstatement, back wages, and salary difference under a labour settlement. He alleged oral termination on 1 May 2011 after being …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The TJSB Sahakari Bank Limited and another filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were directed to comply with certain orders of the Court. They failed to do so and indicated they were not ready to comply. The Court noted …
Premium Tools Private Limited and others challenged a series of orders issued by the Competent Authority under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted recovery certificates. The petitioners argued that the Authority had exceeded its jurisdiction because it did not first …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of interim applications filed in several statutory writ petitions (ST) against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and the court considered whether the delay in filing …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The High Court had earlier stayed a judgment and award directing the petitioner, Oceaneering International GMBH, to pay Rs.10,50,000 as a condition for interim relief, of which the petitioner deposited 50%. The applicant, Sukh Dev Singh Rawat, filed an interim application seeking withdrawal of the …
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled dates. The Court ordered a stand‑over to 29 April 2024 for dismissal and again noted the absence of petitioners' representation. On the subsequent date, the …
The applicants, Nair Pushpa Sureshkumar & Anr., filed an interim application seeking continuation of ad-interim relief in a writ petition that had already been disposed. They had also filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.166 of 2026 before this Court. The Court held that, having become …
The State of Maharashtra challenged an eviction order passed by the City Civil Court under the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955, on the ground that the lease of the land had expired on 31 December 2003. The appellate court had set aside the eviction order, prompting the State to file …
The petitioners, a cooperative housing society, challenged an order by the Registrar under Section 79(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act directing the society to issue a no‑objection certificate to a member seeking to transfer leasehold rights. The society argued that the member could …
Shabnoor Ayub Pathan filed a writ petition (No. 5371 of 2006) in the Bombay High Court against Shri Mahalakshmi Education Society and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while respondents were represented by Mr. Miheer Jayakar (on behalf of Sunil Jaykar) and Mr. Hamid D. Mulla, …
The petitioner, Shabnoor, filed Writ Petition No.7333 of 2007 before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the previous occasion and again failed to appear on the date of hearing. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mrs. M. S. …
Two civil applications (Nos. 2797 of 2016 and 2783 of 2016) were filed before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on behalf of the applicant/petitioner. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and consequently dismissed both applications. No substantive merits were addressed. The dismissal was …
Two civil applications (Nos. 2797 of 2016 and 2783 of 2016) were filed before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on behalf of the applicant/petitioner. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and consequently dismissed both applications. No substantive merits were addressed. The dismissal was …
