Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NASIR HASAN MASTANversusSAIMULLA IKBAL VASTA

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The High Court allowed the interim application and granted bail to the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties.

Summary

Nasir Hasan Mastan was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratnagiri, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs.4,00,000 that was returned as 'unclaimed', and was sentenced to three months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.6,00,000. He appealed the conviction in the Sessions Court, which dismissed the appeal after he deposited Rs.1,20,000 with the court. The applicant then filed a criminal revision seeking relief and filed an interim application for bail, stating that an additional Rs.1,20,000 had been deposited with the magistrate, bringing the total deposit to Rs.2,40,000. He pleaded poverty, lack of antecedents, and willingness to comply with court directions. The High Court, after considering the submissions, allowed the interim application and ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties. The interim application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate relief, if any, that the High Court can grant in an interim application for bail pending a criminal revision where the appellant has partially paid the fine imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 138
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • bail
  • interim application
  • criminal revision
  • fine payment
  • poverty

Judgment

                                                                       901-555-2026-ia.doc


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                           CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 555 OF 2026
                                              IN
                              CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 83 OF 2026
             Nasir Hasan Mastan                                        ....Applicant
                   Vs.
             Saimulla Ikbal Vasta                                     ....Respondent

             Mr. Viraj Nalavade a/w Mr. Narendra Athavale, advocate for the
             Applicant
             Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar APP for the State
                                        CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
                                        DATE : 11 SEPTEMBER 2026
             P. C. :


             1.        The present Interim Application has been filed by the original

             accused challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 11

             August 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in

             Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 2024, and the judgment and order dated

IRESH        30 April 2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class
MASHAL


Digitally
signed by
IRESH
             (for short ‘JMFC’) Ratnagiri, in S.C.C. No. 186 of 2018.
MASHAL
Date:
2026.09.11
17:47:54
+0530




             2.        It is the case of the Applicant that in complaint under Section

             138, the cheque involved was of ₹4,00,000/-. The statutory notice

             under Section 138, according to the Complainant's own case, has

             been returned with the remark "unclaimed". Thereafter, a complaint

             under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed

                                                1 of 3
   Iresh
                                                    901-555-2026-ia.doc


before the JMFC, Ratnagiri.


3.   The learned JMFC, after hearing both the parties, convicted

the Applicant vide order dated 30 April 2024 for the offence

punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and

sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and

to pay a fine of ₹6,00,000/- (Rs.Six Lakhs only) within a period of

30 days, and in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one

month.


4.   The Applicant challenged the order passed by the JMFC before

the Sessions Court by way of Criminal Appeal. By an order passed in

the Sessions Court, an amount of ₹1,20,000/- was deposited with

the Sessions Court. As the learned Sessions Court dismissed the

appeal filed by the Applicant, the present Criminal Revision

Application has been filed by the Applicant.


5.   In the present Criminal Revision Application, by an order

dated 10 September 2026, statement of the Advocate appearing for

the Applicant was recorded that a further sum of ₹1,20,000/- will

be deposited with the JMFC, Ratnagiri, by today. Mr. Nalavade,

learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, submits that the


                               2 of 3
                                                                901-555-2026-ia.doc


        additional amount of ₹1,20,000/- has been deposited with the

        JMFC, Ratnagiri. Therefore, in total, ₹2,40,000/- has been

        deposited by the Applicant.


        6.    He submits that the Applicant comes from a poor background.

        His wife is uneducated, and his only son has just now started to

        work in a company. He has no antecedents and is ready to comply

        with the directions given by this Court, including directions for

        expediting the hearing of the Criminal Revision Application.


        7.    In view of the submissions made by the parties, I am of the

        opinion that Interim Application needs to be allowed.

                                       ORDER

             I.       Interim Application No. 555 of 2026 stands allowed in
             terms of prayer clause (b) and (c).

             II.      Applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in
             the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like
             amount.

             III.     All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this
             order.

        8.    Interim Application stands disposed of.


                                                        [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

                                         3 of 3
Iresh


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.