Bombay High Court
UMESH KONDIBA AVHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court held that the applicant is entitled to suspension of his sentence and release on bail pending the appeal.
Summary
The applicant, Umesh Kondiba Avhad, sought suspension of his sentence and release on bail pending the appeal of his conviction. The record showed that co‑accused Nos.2, 3 and 4, who faced identical charges of assaulting the deceased, had already been released on bail. The respondent’s counsel conceded that the applicant’s role was the same as that of the co‑accused, establishing a claim to parity. The court considered whether this parity justified granting the same interim relief to the applicant. Finding that the applicant was indeed entitled to the same treatment, the court ordered suspension of his sentence and bail on condition of a surety bond and periodic police reporting. The application was allowed with directions for bail conditions and a provision for cancellation upon default.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to suspension of his sentence and release on bail during the pendency of the appeal, based on parity with co‑accused who were granted bail.
Subjects
- bail
- suspension of sentence
- parity with co-accused
- interim relief
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
pmk 13-IA-783-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2026
IN
APPEAL NO.458 OF 2025
Umesh Kondiba Avhad … Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Adv. Sumit Patil i/by Adv. Amit Icham for the Applicant.
Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 8th April, 2026.
P.C.:-
1) This is an Application by Original Accused No.1 for suspension
of sentence and releasing him on bail, during the pendency of the Appeal.
2) Record indicates that, the Original Accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 have
been released on bail by this Court by Orders dated 13 th February, 2026 and
4th March, 2026. Record further indicates that, the role attributed to the
Applicant were same and/or similar to that which has been attributed to
Naresh Donde (Accused No.2), Nayan Suresh Shinde(Accused No.3) and
1/3
pmk 13-IA-783-2026.doc
Avinash Pralhad Sawant(Accused No.4) i.e. have assaulted the deceased
with fist and kick blows.
4) Learned APP after perusing the record fairly conceded to the
fact that, the Applicant is entitled to claim parity with the co-accused
Naresh Donde(Accused No.2), Nayan Suresh Shinde(Accused No.3) and
Avinash Pralhad Sawant(Accused No.4).
5) In view of the above, we are inclined to suspend the
substantive sentence imposed upon the Applicant and release him on bail,
during the pendency of the Appeal.
5.1) Hence, the following Order-
i. During the pendency of the Appeal, the substantive sentence
imposed upon the Applicant is suspended.
ii. Applicant be released on bail in Sessions Case No.263 of 2019
arising out of C.R. No.73 of 2019 registered with Indiranagar
Police Station, Nashik on their furnishing P.R. bond of
Rs.50,000/- with one or more solvent local sureties in the like
amount.
iii. After his release from Jail and during the pendency of the
present Appeal, the Applicant shall attend Indiranagar Police
Station, District Nashik on every first Monday of the month
between 10:00 am and 12:00 noon initially for a period of one
year.
2/3
pmk 13-IA-783-2026.doc
After end of one year, the Applicant shall attend Indiranagar
Police Station, District Nashik on every first Monday of the
every 3rd Month between 10:00 am and 12:00 noon. The
Applicants thus shall attend Indiranagar Police Station, District
Nashik four times in a year during the pendency of the present
Appeal.
iv. In case of two consecutive defaults in complying with the
aforestated conditions, the Prosecution is at liberty to file an
application for cancellation of bail.
6) Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
3/3
Checking your session…