Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMESH KUMAR SACHDEV AND ANRversusTHE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The interim application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners filed an interim application seeking amendment of their writ petition. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court accepted this statement and dismissed the interim application as withdrawn, without ordering any costs. The order was to be digitally signed and circulated by fax or email. No substantive merits of the amendment were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the interim application seeking amendment should be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request?

Subjects

  • interim application
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • High Court of Bombay
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                                            7.ia.9344.2024.doc



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9344 OF 2024
                                                          IN
                                          WRIT PETITION NO.2794 OF 2020

                       Ramesh Kumar Sachdev & Ors.                            .. Petitioners

                                 Versus

          Digitally
          signed by
                       The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,
UTKARSH
          UTKARSH
          KAKASAHEB
KAKASAHEB BHALERAO
                       Central Range-7, Mumbai & Ors.                         .. Respondents
BHALERAO Date:
          2026.02.18
          19:38:40
          +0530

                            Mr.Vivek Batra (through V.C.) a/w Kajal Rajak i/b
                            Vertica Legal, Advocates for the Petitioners.

                            Mr.Ateeba Hasan h/f Suresh Kumar, Advocates for the
                            Respondents.

                                           CORAM      : B. P. COLABAWALLA &
                                                        FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
                                           DATE       : FEBRUARY 17, 2026

                       P. C.



                       1.            The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner

                       states that due to the subsequent developments he does not wish to

                       press the above Interim Application seeking amendments.




                                                      Page 1 of 2
                                                   FEBRUARY 17, 2026
                       Utkarsh
                                                         7.ia.9344.2024.doc



2.             In view of the aforesaid statement, the above Interim

Application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order

as to costs.



3.             This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by

fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.



[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]                   [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]




                                 Page 2 of 2
                              FEBRUARY 17, 2026
Utkarsh


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.