Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI NAMDEO V. SANASversusTHE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHER

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court disposed of the Letters Patent Appeals in accordance with the parties’ consent settlement.

Summary

The Bombay High Court heard four Letters Patent Appeals arising from two writ petitions filed in 1996 between The Indian Hotels Company Limited and Namdev V. Sanas & Others. Two appeals were filed by the hotel company and two by the respondents. The parties presented a settlement agreement, signed on 2 February 2026, which the Court found to be fair and lawful. Accordingly, the Court disposed of all four appeals in accordance with the consent terms. The Court directed the Registry to return the amounts deposited with interest within fifteen days upon filing of a praecipe, and awarded no costs.

Subjects

  • settlement
  • consent terms
  • letters patent appeal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay
  • return of deposited amounts

Judgment

                                                                                  01-LPA-303-10 & ORS.DOC



JYOTI                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAJESH
MANE                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed
by JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.02.04
18:33:06 +0530                    LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 303 OF 2010
                                                  IN
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 1178 OF 1996

                   The Indian Hotels Co.Ltd.                     ...Appellant
                         Versus
                   Namdeo V.Sanas And Anr                        ...Respondents

                                                 WITH
                                  LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2010
                                                  IN
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3529 OF 1996

                   Namdeo V.Sanas And Anr                        ...Appellant
                         Versus
                   The Indian Hotels Co.Ltd.                     ...Respondents

                                                WITH
                                   LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2011
                                                   IN
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 3529 OF 1996

                   The Indian Hotels Co.Ltd.                     ...Appellant
                         Versus
                   Namdeo V.Sanas And Anr                        ...Respondents

                                                 WITH
                                  LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 293 OF 2010
                                                  IN
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 1178 OF 1996

                   Namdeo V.Sanas And Anr                        ...Appellant
                         Versus
                   The Indian Hotels Co.Ltd.                     ...Respondents


                                                       _______
                   Mr. Navraj Jalota with Mr. Rajesh Satpalkar a/w. Mr.Devnash Gadda i/b. Mulla &
                   Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for Appellant in LPA Nos. 303/10 & 21/11 and
                   for Respondent in LPA Nos. 293/10 and 289/10.




                                                   Page 1 of 3
                   Mane
                                                                01-LPA-303-10 & ORS.DOC



Mr. Yogesh B. Dandekar a/w. Ms. Shrushti Vishwakarma for Respondent in LPA
Nos. 303/10 & LPA 21/11 and for Appellant in LPA Nos. 293/10 & 289/10.
                                     _______


                            CORAM:         G. S. KULKARNI &
                                           AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                            DATE:          02 FEBRUARY 2026

P.C.

1.          These are four Letters Patent Appeals arising from the order dated 28th

October 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1178 of

1996 and Writ Petition No. 3529 of 1996.

2.        Two of the Letters Patent Appeals, namely LPA No. 21 of 2011 and LPA

No. 303 of 2010, are filed by the original Petitioner, Indian Hotels Company

Limited. The other two Letters Patent Appeals, namely LPA No. 289 of 2010 and

LPA No. 293 of 2010, are filed by the original Respondents, Namdev V. Sanas &

Others.

3.        We have heard learned counsel for the parties on an earlier occasion. We

have also noted in our earlier order that, pursuant to the interim order passed by

this Court, certain amounts have been deposited with this Court by Indian Hotels

Company Limited.

4.         Learned counsel for the parties, who are present before the Court, state

that the parties have agreed to settle the disputes subject matter of these four

Letters Patent Appeals in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms, signed

by the parties also by their respective Advocates which are dated 2nd February



                                  Page 2 of 3
Mane
                                                                 01-LPA-303-10 & ORS.DOC



2026, as placed on record. The signatories to the Consent Terms are present before

the Court and are identified by their respective Advocates. In our opinion, the

Consent Terms reflect a fair and lawful settlement of the disputes between the

parties. The Consent Terms are accordingly taken on record and marked ‘X’ for

identification.

5.      The Letters Patent Appeals are accordingly disposed of in terms of the

Consent Terms.

6.      The Registry is directed to take appropriate steps to the return the amounts

as deposited in this Court, along with accrued interest, in accordance with law.

Necessary action be taken upon an appropriate praecipe being moved with the

Registry, on behalf of the parties, and within a period of 15 days from the date of

submission of such praecipe, by following the prescribed procedure.

7.       No costs.




       (AARTI SATHE, J.)                        (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                  Page 3 of 3
Mane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.