Bombay High Court
Bisleri International Private LimitedversusSandeep Jain
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHARMILA U DESHMUKH
Holding
The court extended the ad‑interim relief to the additional infringing mark and allowed the leave petition to combine the causes of action.
Summary
Bisleri International Private Ltd filed an interim application seeking to amend its pleadings to include additional infringing marks identified by the Court Receiver, specifically "AMRAT BISLIRI." The Court examined the report of the Receiver, finding the new mark visually and phonetically similar to Bisleri's registered trademark and copying its artwork. The Judge allowed the amendment and extended the ad‑interim relief dated 19 December 2025 to cover the additional infringing mark, ordering seizure of the related goods. The matter was listed for further consideration on 15 April 2026, with the interim relief to continue until then. A separate leave petition under clause XIV of the Letters Patent (Bombay) was filed to combine the causes of action for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off; the defendant did not respond, and the petition was allowed to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Issues considered
- Whether the ad‑interim relief can be extended to cover the additional infringing mark "AMRAT BISLIRI".
- Whether the amendment of the pleadings to include the new infringing mark is permissible.
- Whether a leave petition under clause XIV of the Letters Patent (Bombay) can be allowed to combine trademark, copyright, and passing‑off causes of action.
Legislation cited
- Copyright Act, 1957
- Letters Patent (Bombay)
- Trade Marks Act, 1999
Subjects
- trademark infringement
- passing off
- copyright infringement
- interim relief
- amendment of pleadings
- leave petition
- court receiver
- combined cause of action
Judgment
77-IA(L)-40551-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 40551 OF 2025
IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 709 OF 2025
WITH
LEAVE PETITION NO. 2 OF 2026
Bisleri International Private Limited ...Applicant/
Plaintiff
Versus
Sandeep Jain ...Defendant
——————
Mr. Vinod Bhagat a/w Ms. Twisha Singh i/b Mr. Vinod Bhagat, for the
Plaintiff.
Mrs. Rucha Ambekar, Master Admin, Court Receiver.
Ms. Nidhi i/b Ms. Pooja Jain (Through VC), for the Defendant.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : March 04, 2026
P. C. :
1. Mr. Bhagat, learned counsel for the Plaintiff tenders schedule of
draft amendment. The same is taken on record. Considering the nature
of amendment, the same is allowed. Amendment to be carried out
within a period of 3 weeks. Re-verification is dispensed with.
2. Mr. Bhagat submits that during the execution of the commission,
the Court Receiver found additional infringing marks i.e "AMRAT
Chavan 1 of 3
77-IA(L)-40551-2025.doc
BISLIRI". He points out to the Court Receiver's Report which mentions
the infringing products. He submits that as there is infringement of the
Plaintiff's registered trade mark by use of deceptively sounding
trademark as well as infringement of the label mark, ad-interim order
of 19th December, 2025 be extended to the additional infringing marks
of "AMRAT BISLIRI".
3. Prima facie, upon perusal of additional infringing mark, it is
evident that the infringing mark is visually and phonetically similar to
the Plaintiff's registered mark and the Defendant has copied the
essential features of the Plaintiff's original art work including colour
scheme/ getup/ layout. In light of the same, the ad-interim relief
granted by order of 19th December, 2025 is extended to the additional
infringing mark of "AMRAT BISLIRI". Additional infringing goods have
already been seized by the Court Receiver and forms part of the Court
Receiver's Report. List the application for further consideration on 15th
April, 2026.
4. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.
LEAVE PETITION NO. 2 OF 2026
5. The Petition has been filed under clause XIV of the Letters
Patent (Bombay) for combining the cause of action of infringement of
trademark and copyright with the cause of action for passing off. There
Chavan 2 of 3
77-IA(L)-40551-2025.doc
is no response filed by the Defendants to the Leave Petition. In order
to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, Leave Petition is allowed.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Chavan 3 of 3
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.