Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Hindustan Unilever LimitedversusAmber Avenue Private Limited

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court, accepting the parties' consent terms, decreed the suit granting perpetual injunctions restraining the defendants from infringing the plaintiff's Splat logo trademark and Surf Excel artistic works, and discharged the court receiver.

Summary

The parties in a commercial IP suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited against Amber Avenue Private Limited settled the dispute amicably. The consent terms, signed by the authorized signatories of both parties, were recorded and the court accepted them as an undertaking. The court decreed the suit in accordance with the prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c), granting perpetual injunctions restraining the defendants from infringing HUL's Splat logo trademark and from copying the artistic works of Surf Excel, and ordered the discharge of the court receiver without accounts. The court also ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff and disposed of all interim applications. The leave petition filed by the plaintiff was allowed as the suit was settled.

Issues considered

  • Whether the defendants infringed Hindustan Unilever's registered Splat logo trademark in Class 03.
  • Whether the defendants infringed Hindustan Unilever's copyright in the original artistic works of Surf Excel.
  • Whether a perpetual injunction should be granted to restrain the defendants from using the impugned logo, artwork, packaging or trade dress.

Subjects

  • trademark infringement
  • copyright infringement
  • perpetual injunction
  • settlement
  • court receiver
  • commercial IP suit
  • Splat logo
  • Surf Excel
  • decree

Judgment

            Digitally
            signed by
            SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA    QUTBUDDIN
QUTBUDDIN   PATHAN
PATHAN      Date:                                                      909-COMIP-L-3973-2026.doc
            2026.05.11
            17:54:36
            +0530
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                           IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                                     COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO. 3973 OF 2026

                    Hindustan Unilever Limited                               …Plainti$/
                                                                              Applicant
                              Versus
                    Amber Avenue Private Limited                             ...Defendant
                                                     WITH
                                INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4191 OF 2026
                                                     WITH
                                COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.166 OF 2026
                                              (NOT ON BOARD)
                                                     WITH
                                      LEAVE PETITION NO.54 OF 2026
                                                       IN
                                 COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO. 3973 OF 2026
                                                 ——————
                    Ms. Niyati Davawala a/w Mr. Anil Shete, Ms. Nidhi Rao, Ms. Chandrika
                    Devda i/b Davawala & Co. for the Plainti /Applicant

                    Mr. Pratik K. Shah for the Defendants

                    Mr. Hitesh D. Parekh, Authorized Signatory of Defendant No.1 and
                    Proprietor of Defendant No.2 is present through VC

                    Mr. Naresh D. Parekh, Proprietor of Defendant No.3 is present through VC

                    Ms. Nandini Y. Deshpande, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver a/w Ms. E. S.
                    D’Souza, Section O/cer, Court Receiver’s O/ce, are present in Court
                                              ——————
                                             CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
                                                 DATE    : MAY 8, 2026
                    P. C. :

                    1.        This Court is informed that the dispute has been amicably settled


        SQ Pathan                                                                           1/4
                                                                909-COMIP-L-3973-2026.doc


            between the parties. The Consent Terms are tendered, which are taken

            on record and marked “X” for identi8cation. The Consent Terms are

            signed by the authorized signatory of the Plainti$ and by the

            Authorized Signatory of Defendant No.1/Proprietor of Defendant No.2

            and the Proprietor of Defendant No.3, who are present virtually and

            reiterate the terms of the Consent Terms. They submit to a decree on

            admission in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), and (c) of the plaint. Their

            identities are veri8ed by their counsel. The resolutions are annexed to

            the Consent Terms. The statement made in the Consent Terms is

            accepted as undertaking given to the Court.

            2.    The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), and (c) of

            the plaint, which read thus:

                    “(a) the Defendants by themselves, their directors, servants,
                    agents, stockists, distributors, dealers and all persons claiming
                    through them be restrained by an order and perpetual
                    injunction of this Hon'ble Court from infringing the Plainti$s
                    registered Splat logo trade mark bearing Registration Nos.
                    1486106, 1486108, 1486109, 1486107, 1780462, 3912308,
                    4484160 and 4563303 all in Class 03, by the use of the
                    impugned logo (appended at Exhibit L-3 hereinabove) and/or
                    any other trade mark/ logo identical with or deceptively similar
                    to the Plainti$s registered Splat logo trade mark bearing
                    Registration No. 1486106, 1486108, 1486109, 1486107,
                    1780462, 3912308, 4484160 and 4563303 all in Class 03 in
                    respect of the goods covered by the Plainti$s aforesaid
                    registration or in any other manner whatsoever;

                    b) the Defendants by themselves, their directors, servants,
                    agents, stockists, distributors, dealers and all persons claiming
                    through them be restrained by a perpetual order and
                    injunction of this Hon'ble Court from manufacturing and/or
                    trading, marketing, importing, distributing, selling and/or using


SQ Pathan                                                                               2/4
                                                                 909-COMIP-L-3973-2026.doc


                   in any manner whatsoever in relation detergent preparations,
                   the impugned artworks / packagings / trade dresses (appended
                   at Exhibits L-1 and L-2 hereinabove) bearing colour scheme, lay-
                   out, get-up, style, artwork, trade dress and representation or
                   any other artwork/s which is/are identical with and/or is/are
                   substantially/strikingly similar to the Plainti$s' original artistic
                   works of Surf Excel (appended at Exhibits D and E
                   hereinabove) so· as to infringe upon the Plainti$s subsisting
                   copyright in the original artistic works for . the aforesaid
                   products;

                   c) the Defendants by themselves, their directors, servants,
                   agents, stockists, distributors, dealers and all persons claiming
                   through them be restrained by an order and perpetual
                   injunction of this Hon'ble Court from using the impugned logo
                   and/or any other trade mark/ logo/ device which is identical
                   with and/or closely and deceptively similar to the Plainti$s said
                   well-known Splat Logo and/or from using the impugned
                   artworks / packagings / trade dresses/logo (appended at
                   Exhibit L-1; L-2 and L-3 hereinabove) and/or any other
                   packaging/trade dress/logo which is identical with and/or
                   deceptively similar to the Plainti$s' original artistic works of
                   Surf Excel (appended at Exhibits D and E hereinabove) and
                   Splat Logo (appended at Exhibit B hereinabove) so as to pass
                   o$ or enable others to pass o$ the Defendants' goods as and
                   for the Plainti$s well-known goods or in any other manner
                   whatsoever.”

            3.    Refund of court fees as per rules.

            COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.166 OF 2026 (NOT ON BOARD)

            4.    Court Receiver's Report is disposed of. Court Receiver stands

            discharged without passing of accounts. All costs, charges and

            expenses of the Court Receiver to be paid by the Plainti$ within a

            period of 8 days on demand being raised from the oMce of the Court

            Receiver.




SQ Pathan                                                                                 3/4
                                                          909-COMIP-L-3973-2026.doc




            INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4191 OF 2026

            5.    Interim Application (L) No.4191 of 2026 and other interim

            applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand

            disposed of.

            LEAVE PETITION NO.54 OF 2026

            6.    As the Suit has been settled between the parties, Leave Petition

            is allowed.



                                               [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




SQ Pathan                                                                      4/4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.