Bombay High Court
SONAL SANJIV DESHPANDEversusMASTER YASHRAJ SANJIV DESHPANDE
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court granted leave to the guardian to sell the minor’s share, dispensed the notice requirement, and permitted investment of the proceeds in a fixed deposit for the minor’s benefit.
Summary
The petitioner, a natural guardian, sought leave to sell a flat in which a minor held a 33.34% share, invoking Section 8(2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The minor’s share arose after the deceased father’s intestate death and a subsequent gift deed by the mother to the minor. The court examined whether the guardian could dispose of the minor’s share without the notice required under Section 31(4) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and whether the sale proceeds could be invested for the minor’s benefit. Relying on the joint ownership and the welfare of the minor, the judge held that the sale was permissible and the notice requirement could be dispensed with. The court ordered that the guardian may execute the sale, receive the minor’s proportionate consideration, and invest it in a fixed deposit for the minor’s future needs.
Issues considered
- Whether a natural guardian may sell a minor’s share in immovable property under Section 8(2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
- Whether the notice under Section 31(4) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 can be dispensed with in such a sale.
- Whether the proceeds of the sale can be invested in a fixed deposit for the benefit of the minor.
Legislation cited
- Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 — s. 31(4)
- Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 — s. 8(2)
Subjects
- guardianship
- minor's property
- sale of immovable property
- Section 8(2) HMGA
- Section 31(4) GWA
- fixed deposit
- intestate succession
- gift deed
Judgment
10 - MP-9-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDIINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 9 OF 2026
Sonal Sanjiv Deshpande Petitioner
Versus
Master Yashraj Sanjiv
Deshpande Respondent
_______
Mr. Vishal Kanade a/w Mr. Chirag Dave a/w Ms. Soumya Srinivasan a/w Kanak
Nigam, Advocates, i/by Legasis Partners for the Petitioner.
_______
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 28th AUGUST 2026.
P.C.
1. By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking leave to deal with the shares of
the minor in Flat No. 203 admeasuring 472.21 square feet equivalent to 43.87
square meters (carpet) along with 249 square feet of terrace, on the 2 nd floor,Wing
B, of the building known as “Pavanputra” of Pavanputra Sahakari Gruhnirman
Sanstha Maryadit, situated at Dr. Earnest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai – 400 012
(herein after referred to as said flat).
2. Brief facts are as follows:
i. The Petitioner is the natural guardian of minor Master. Yashraj Sanjjiv
Deshpande who was born on 30 September 2013. The present Petition is filed
under Section 8 (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (here in
Page 1 of 4
Bharati
10 - MP-9-2026.DOC
after referred to as Act). The Petitioner and her husband acquired equal shares in
the said flat on 14 October 2015.
ii. On 27 February 2022, the Petitioner's husband Mr. Sanjiv Digambar
Deshpande died intestate leaving the Petitioner, the minor and his mother Shrimati
Nirmala Digambar Deshpande as the only surviving legal heirs. His 50% shares in
the said flat devolved on them equally.
iii. On 14 November 2022, Shrimati Nirmala Digambar Deshpande gifted
her entire share in the said flat to the minor by a registered gift deed there by
making the Petitioner and the minor hold 66.66% and 33.34% shares respectively.
iv. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by an order dated 7 August 2023,
granted heirship certificate in Miscellaneous Petition number MP/350/2023.
v. Thereafter on 17 June 2026, the Petitioner along with the minor
entered into a Term sheet with the purchaser, Mr. Laukik Rajnish More, for sale of
the said flat for a price of Rs. 1,85,00,000/-. The consideration which has been
fixed for the purchase of the aforesaid flat is far higher than the ready reckoner
value and is therefore, reasonable considering the present market condition
prevalent in the area where the said flat is located. The minor's share of 33.34% is
valued at around Rs. 65,01,900/- and it is the Petitioner's contention that the
agreement for sale has to be executed within 7 days of leave being granted by this
Court.
3. It is also submitted that the Petitioner intends to sell the said flat for the
advantage of the minor and undertakers to keep the consideration amount received
against/proportionate to the shares of minor as fixed deposit in a bank which
Page 2 of 4
Bharati
10 - MP-9-2026.DOC
entitles the account owner to receive interest there on and the same will be highly
profitable till the minor attends the age of majority.
4. The Petitioner further submits that the said monies would be later on
realized/used for the minor's benefit such as his education, investment, marriage
and other expenses in the interest of the minor on the minor attending majority for
the reasons/purpose he deems fit.
5. The Petitioner has also mentioned the reason for proposed sale which is
namely, due to the advanced age of the mother of the deceased who is one of the
legal heirs. The said flat is not occupied personally by the heir and the Petitioner is
facing difficulty in maintaining the said flat in relation to other multiple properties
left behind by the said deceased.
6. The Petitioner has accordingly sought for the aforementioned relief in
the Petition.
7. I have heard Mr. Vishal Kanade, the learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner and considering the submissions as well as averments in the Petition, in
my view as the Petitioner and the minor are the joint owners of the said flat, having
share of 66.66% and 33.34% respectively and given the reasons for proposed sale
of the said flat which would be in the interest and welfare of the minor and that the
minor’s share will be secured in the form of fixed deposit receipt in a bank which
will earn interest, this is fit case to grant the relief sought for in the Miscellaneous
Petition.
8. Hence, the Miscellaneous Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer
Clauses (a), (b) and (c) which read thus:-
Page 3 of 4
Bharati
10 - MP-9-2026.DOC
(a) Issuance of Notice under Section 31 (4) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890
may be dispensed with;
(b) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the present Petition and grant leave
to the Petitioner to deal with/sell the share of the Minor in the Pavanputra Premises,
being Flat No. 203 admeasuring 472.21 square feet equivalent to 43.87 square
meters (carpet) along with 249 square feet of terrace, on the 2 nd floor,Wing B, of the
building known as “Pavanputra” of Pavanputra Sahakari Gruhnirman Sanstha
Maryadit, situated at Dr. Earnest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai – 400 012, together
with ten shares of Rs. 50/- each bearing distinctive Nos. 881 to 890, represented
through Share Certificate No. 83, under Section 8 (2) of the said Act, and
authorized the Petitioner to execute and register, for and on behalf of the Minor, all
such agreements, deeds and documents in favour of the above identified buyer as
may be necessary for concluding the sale of the Pavanputra Premises;
(c) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant the Petitioner leave to receive the
proportionate amount against the share of the Minor (being 33.34%) out of the total
sale consideration to be received against the sale of the Pavanputra Premises, and
invest the same into a separate fixed deposit to be created for the benefit of the
Minor;
9. The Miscellaneous Petition disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.
10. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order to take further
steps.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 4 of 4
Bharati
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.