Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Khandu Vishnu PhapaleversusVishnu Bhau Phapale alias Vishnu B Phapale alias V B Phapale

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that a legal heirship certificate may be issued to all legal heirs notwithstanding the title dispute, and that such issuance does not adjudicate ownership of the property.

Summary

The deceased left three sons—Khandu, Bhausaheb and Hari—and his wife had predeceased him. Khandu filed a petition for a Legal Heirship Certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 to facilitate dealings with a specific immovable property. After a proclamation, Hari and Bhausaheb (through an affidavit in Hari's favour) appeared and contested the entitlement to the property, which has been in Hari's name since 2005 and is subject to disputed writings. The Court held that the grant of a legal heirship certificate can be issued to all three heirs despite the title dispute, but clarified that the grant does not determine ownership of the property, which must be resolved in a civil suit. The petition was allowed, the grant ordered within two weeks, and no further proclamation was required.

Issues considered

  • Whether a legal heirship certificate may be issued when there is a dispute over title to the immovable property.
  • Whether issuance of the certificate determines ownership of the property.
  • Whether any further proclamation is necessary before granting the certificate.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Legal Heirship Certificate
  • Succession
  • Immovable Property
  • Title Dispute
  • Bombay Regulation VIII
  • Civil Court Jurisdiction
  • Probate

Judgment

                                                                         13. MPT-410-26.odt


Amberkar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION


                              MISC. PETITION NO. 410 OF 2026

           Vishnu Bhau Phapale alias
           Vishnu B. Phapale alias
           V.B. Phapale                                           .. Deceased

           Khandu Vishnu Phapale                                  .. Petitioner
                                  ....................
            Ms. Seema Hunnurkar i/by Mr. Mohan Gawade, Advocates for
             Petitioner
            Mr. Rudresh Jagdale i/by Mr. Rohit Mangsule, Advocates for
             Respondent
                                           ...................
                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                          DATE          : MAY 8, 2026
           P. C.:

           1.       Heard Ms. Hunnurkar, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr.

           Jagdale, learned Advocate for Respondent.


           2.       Deceased has three sons. The wife had predeceased him. There

           names are Khandu, Bhausaheb and Hari.                 Khandu has filed the

           Application for issuance of grant which is Legal Heirship Certificate in

           respect of declaration of legal heirs under Section 2 of the Bombay

           Regulation VIII of 1827. Purpose of seeking grant is stated in the

           Petition with regard to particular immovable property.                 However

           proclamation is issued and on receipt of proclamation, Mr. Jagdale

           learned Advocate appears for the other two legal heirs i.e. Hari and

           Bhausaheb. Bhausaheb has given affidavit in favour of Hari. Khandu


                                                                                     1 of 3
                                                          13. MPT-410-26.odt


is Petitioner on one side and Hari, the other son on the other side are

contesting entitlement to the subject immovable property on the basis

of certain writings which are executed in the past. Be that as it may,

insofar as the present Petition is concerned, it is with regard to grant

of Legal Heirship Certificate and Khandu has prayed for the legal

Heirship certified to be granted in the names of all three legal heirs of

deceased.   Therefore there can be no impediment in allowing the

Petition.


3.    However Mr. Jagdale would submit that the property which is

the subject matter of Petition is standing in the name of Hari sine 2005

and thereafter certain writings are executed between the parties which

are in dispute.   Khandu is disputing the entire position. In such a

scenario, there can be no impediment in allowing the grant, but it is

clarified that issuance of grant in the Petition filed by Khandu ipso

facto does not mean that the concerned immovable property for the

purpose for which it is filed shall be transferred in the name of the

Petitioner on the basis of the grant.       To that extent parties are

relegated to the Civil Court and whichever party desires to contest and

prosecute their substantive right for entitlement to the immovable

property are entitled to do so strictly in accordance with law. Issuance

of grant is not determination of title in favour of any of the legal heirs

to the property


                                                                      2 of 3
                                                                      13. MPT-410-26.odt


           4.         Grant be issued subject to all other compliances within a period

           of two weeks from today. No further proclamation is required to be

           issued.


           5.         Petition is allowed and disposed.



Amberkar                                             [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                    Digitally
                    signed by
                    RAVINDRA
           RAVINDRA MOHAN
           MOHAN    AMBERKAR
           AMBERKAR Date:
                    2026.05.11
                    17:36:08
                    +0530




                                                                                  3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.