Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA SHESHRAO GAWANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The revision application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal under Section 11 of the MPID Act, and the registry shall not raise a limitation issue.
Summary
Ravindra Sheshrao Gawande filed Criminal Revision Application No. 22 of 2024 against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the revision and to file an appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. The learned single judge considered the request and allowed the withdrawal, granting the applicant liberty to file the appeal. The court further directed that the registry should not raise any limitation objection because the revision application was pending. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as withdrawn along with any other pending applications. The order was pronounced on 8 October 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant may be granted leave to withdraw the criminal revision application.
- Whether the registry can raise a limitation objection to a subsequent appeal under Section 11 of the MPID Act.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- criminal revision
- withdrawal of application
- limitation
- MPID Act
- appeal
Judgment
34-REVN-22-2024 (CR).doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2024
Ravindra Sheshrao Gawande ...Applicant/s
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI SATISH
by SONALI
KILAJE
SATISH Date:
2026.10.09
KILAJE 15:19:54
+0530
Mr. Vinod Kashid i/b. Mr. Gaurav Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw this application with liberty to file Appeal under Section 11 of
Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments)
Act, 1999 (for short “MPID Act”).
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,
application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. If appeal is filed
Registry shall not raise the issue of limitation as the present Application was
pending.
4. The Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn. All pending
applications, if any, also disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1 to 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.