Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEEPAK K.DIALANIversusRAKESH SAJJAN SINGH LADWAL and ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The criminal revision application filed in 2004 remained pending for over two decades without being circulated or listed. When finally listed on 12 January 2026, neither the applicant nor any counsel appeared. The court noted the prolonged inactivity and the applicant's failure to prosecute the matter. Consequently, the court placed the matter on the board for dismissal. The revision was therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision application pending for an extended period can be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • non-prosecution
  • procedural default
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                          Digitally
                                          signed by
                                          CHITRA
                          CHITRA   SANJAY
                          SANJAY   SONAWANE
                          SONAWANE Date:
                                          2026.01.13
                                          15:11:24
                                          +0530



Chitra Sonawane                                                                    1-REVN-242-2004.doc



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

         Criminal Revision Application No.242 of 2004

Deepak K Dialani
303, Brookefields, Lokhandwala
Complex, Andheri West, Mumbai.                                                 … Applicant.
           Vs.
1. Rakesh Sajjan Singh Ladwal
Presently Asst. Commissioner,
Central Excise, having his office
at Rishikesh Apartment Tarapur
Industrial Estate, MIDC, Tarapur,
Boisar, District Thane.

2. The State of Maharashtra                                                    … Respondents.
                                    ---
None for the applicant.
Ms MR Tidke, APP for the respondent / State.
Mr Arjun Dere a/w Mr Saurabh Mehta i/by Mr HH Ponda
for respondent No.1.
                        ---
                          Coram : R.N.Laddha, J.
                          Date : 13 January 2026.
P.C. :

      This Criminal Revision Application has remained
pending since the year 2004. Today, when the matter is
called     out,   none   present                    for                  the    Applicant/original
Complainant. The record reveals that since the filing of the

                            Page No. 1 of 2
                          ____________________________________________


                               13 January 2026
Chitra Sonawane                                                               1-REVN-242-2004.doc



present Revision Application, the same was never circulated
and was first listed on 12 January 2026. On the said date as
well, none appeared for the applicant, and consequently, the
matter was placed on today’s board under the caption ‘for
dismissal’.       In these circumstances, the present Criminal
Revision Application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.


                                                                          [R. N. Laddha, J.]




                             Page No. 2 of 2
                           ____________________________________________


                                13 January 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.