Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Jeewan Singh Mehra etcversusJyoti Kumari

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The court held that revision applications may be withdrawn when the parties have settled their dispute, and ordered their disposal.

Summary

The applicants, Jeewan Singh Mehra and Rekha Mehra, filed revision applications (Nos. 580 and 618 of 2024) against Jyoti Kumari and the State of Maharashtra in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, the parties reached a settlement of their disputes. Both sides, through their counsel, jointly requested the court to withdraw the pending revision applications. The court examined whether a settled dispute permits the withdrawal of pending revision proceedings. Finding no legal impediment, the court permitted the withdrawal and ordered the applications to be disposed. Consequently, the revision applications were withdrawn and the matter was closed.

Issues considered

  • Whether revision applications pending before the High Court can be withdrawn after the parties have settled the dispute.

Subjects

  • revision
  • withdrawal
  • settlement
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                    9-REVN-580-2024=.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CR. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 580 OF 2024
                                                          WITH
                                        CR. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 618 OF 2024

         Digitally
                          1. Jeewan Singh Mehra
         signed by
         SHRADDHA
SHRADDHA KAMLESH
KAMLESH TALEKAR
                          2. Rekha Mehra                                     …Applicants
TALEKAR  Date:
         2026.02.09
         20:42:58
         +0530
                                 Versus
                          1. Jyoti Kumari
                          2. State of Maharashtra                            …Respondents


                               Mr.Naveen Sharma a/w. Ms. Bhagyashree Birajdar, for Applicant.
                               Mr. Tejas Kamble (through VC), for Respondent No. 1.
                               Ms. Savita M. Yadav, APP for Respondent No. 2-State.



                                        CORAM        : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                        Date         : 6th February, 2026

                          PC :


                          1.           Mr. Sharma, Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants
                          and Mr. Tejas Kamble, Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent
                          No.1 state that the parties have settled the disputes, and therefore, seek
                          withdrawal of the revision applications.
                          2.           Accordingly, the captioned revision applications are allowed
                          to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.



                                                                        [ MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]


                                                            Page 1 of 1
                                                        6th February, 2026
               Shraddha


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.