Bombay High Court
UMESH BUDHAJI THAKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- M S KARNIKS M MODAK
Holding
The Court held that there was no error apparent in the impugned order and dismissed the review petition.
Summary
Umesh Budhaji Thakar filed a review petition (Review Petition No.9 of 2019) challenging the order dated 9 October 2018 passed in Writ Petition No.6610 of 2015 against the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought a re‑examination of the earlier order on the ground that it contained an error apparent. The High Court, after examining the record, held that no error apparent existed in the impugned order. The Court further observed that even if a review were to be considered, the petitioner had not made out any case for such relief. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed. The judgment was delivered by Justices A.A. Sayed and Nitin W. Sambre.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dated 9 October 2018 contains any error apparent warranting a review
- Whether the review petition is maintainable in the circumstances
Subjects
- review petition
- error apparent
- high court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- order dismissal
Judgment
1/1
RPW-9-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.9 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6610 OF 2015
...
Umesh Budhaji Thakar ....Review Petitioner
V/S
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
...
Mr.Sushant C. Yeramwar for the Review Petitioner.
Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State.
...
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATED : 25 FEBRUARY 2019
(IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.)
P.C.:
We find no error apparent in the order under review dated
9 October 2018. Even otherwise, no case for review is made out. The
Review Petition is dismissed.
(NITIN W.SAMBRE,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)
Uday.P.Kambli 1/1
Checking your session…