Bombay High Court
MS Neelkanth ConstructionsversusNikhil Narayan Bare
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The court approved the parties' consent settlement, added the society as a respondent, and quashed the impugned orders, thereby disposing of the appeals.
Summary
The appellant, Neelkanth Constructions, filed four second appeals against various respondents. All parties consented to a settlement, signing a consent term that added a society as a respondent in each appeal. The court recorded the consent terms, accepted the undertakings, and directed the appellant to issue cheques for 20% of the corpus fund. The court permitted the filing of a vakalatnama for the society, amended the pleadings to include the society, and disposed of all four appeals in accordance with the settlement. Consequently, the previously impugned orders were quashed and set aside, and all pending applications were declared infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the society can be added as a respondent in the second appeals by consent of the parties
- Whether the court can approve the consent settlement and quash the impugned orders
Subjects
- consent order
- settlement
- addition of party
- quash order
- second appeal
- Civil Procedure Code
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:30186
4-SA-124-2025.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2025
Swapnil
Neelkanth Constructions. …Appellant
Vs.
Sujay Rajaln Joshi. …Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5288 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3220 OF 2025
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2025
Neelkanth Constructions. …Appellant
Vs.
Deepesh S Singh. …Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3224 OF 2025
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5303 OF 2026
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2025
Neelkanth Constructions. …Appellant
Vs.
Nikhil Narayan Bare. …Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5298 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3227 OF 2025
1/4
4-SA-124-2025.docx
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2025
Neelkanth Constructions. …Appellant
Vs.
Vaibhav Prabhakar Balla. …Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5295 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3229 OF 2025
Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe for the appellant.
Mr. Nilesh Garde a/w. Mr. Bajrang Solanke for respondent
no.1 and proposed respondent no. 2.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 22nd JULY 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned counsels for the respective parties have
tendered the common consent terms in all the four second
appeals. The consent terms is signed by the partner and the
authorised representative of the appellant and all the four
complainants who are the respondent in the second appeals.
By consent of the parties, the society is added as a party
respondent in all the second appeals. The authorised
representative of the society has also signed the consent
terms. All the signatories are present in the court. The
2/4
4-SA-124-2025.docx
signatories are identified by their respective advocates. The
advocates have also signed the consent terms. The
respective authority letters of the appellant and the society
are annexed to the consent terms. The identity documents of
the complainants are annexed to the consent terms. The
signatories who are present in the court, identified their
signatures and admit the terms to be true and correct.
2. Consent terms dated 22nd July 2026 is taken on record
and marked as “X1” with today’s date for identification.
3. I have perused the consent terms. The terms are legal
and valid. The undertakings and assurances in the consent
terms are accepted as undertakings to this court. The 20%
amount of the corpus fund, as mentioned in paragraph 9 of
the consent terms is to be paid on or before execution of the
consent terms. Learned counsel for the appellant, on
instructions, submits that the same would be paid till the end
of the day by issuing cheque. The statement is accepted.
The cheques to the complainants for the amount stated in
the consent terms are handed over to the complainants. The
partner and the authorised representative of the appellant
undertakes to this court on behalf of the appellant that the
3/4
4-SA-124-2025.docx
cheques issued pursuant to the consent terms shall be
honoured. The statements and undertakings made on behalf
of the appellant are accepted as the undertakings to this
court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent in all the second
appeals submits that he shall file vakalatnama on behalf of
the society. Liberty to file vakalatnama.
5. The appellant is permitted to add the society as a party
respondent in all the second appeals. Amendment to be
carried out forthwith in the court.
6. All the four second appeals, are disposed of in terms of
the consent terms.
7. In view of an amicable settlement between the parties,
the orders impugned in the second appeals are quashed and
set aside.
8. All other pending applications are disposed of as
infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
4/4
Checking your session…