Bombay High Court
SADASHIV L. SHELARversusMARUTI L. SHELAR AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The Court held that the interim stay should continue to operate for eight weeks.
Summary
The appellant, Sadashiv Laxman Shelar, filed a second appeal seeking to maintain the interim stay that had been granted on 20 June 2001. The principal issue before the Court was whether that stay should be continued pending the final determination of the appeal. The Court examined the submissions of counsel for both parties and found no justification to vary the existing order. Consequently, the Court ordered that the interim relief continue to operate for a further period of eight weeks. No other orders were made in the judgment.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim stay granted on 20 June 2001 should be continued pending the final disposal of the second appeal
Subjects
- interim stay
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- second appeal
- stay of proceedings
- temporary injunction
Judgment
901-SA-240-2001.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Harshada
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 240 OF 2001
Sadashiv Laxman Shelar … Appellant
(Orig.Def.No.1)
vs.
Maruti Laxman Shelar and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. V. B. Nighot for Appellant.
Mr. Rahul Soman a/w. Mr. Shivraj Patne and Mr. Aditya Shirke
Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Dhanashree Y. Bhate a/w. Y. S. Bhate for Respondent Nos.4(a)
to 4(D)
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 02nd JULY 2026
ORDER:
1. After the Judgment is pronounced, learned counsel for
appellant seeks continuation of order of stay operating in the second
appeal. The interim relief granted on 20th June 2001 shall continue
to operate for eight weeks.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Digitally signed
HARSHADA by HARSHADA
HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date: 2026.07.03
16:14:31 +0530
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…