Bombay High Court
ESQUE FINMARK PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDILIP KUMAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- N JAMADAR
Holding
The Court held that the phrase "six months" in clause (viii) was a clerical error and must be read as "60 days".
Summary
The Bombay High Court, acting suo moto, reviewed the minutes of its order dated 17 June 2026. It identified a clerical mistake in clause (viii) of the operative part where the term "six months" was used. The Court directed that this phrase be corrected to read "60 days". No other part of the order was altered. The corrected order was to be uploaded accordingly.
Subjects
- clerical correction
- suo moto
- court order
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:24594
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
25 sa 5 of 2026-2.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.5 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2026
Macrotech Developers Ltd. ... Appellant
versus
Dilip Kumar and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO.57 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.38621 OF 2025
Esque Finmark Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
versus
Surendra Gauri Shankar and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO.52 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.38703 OF 2025
Esque Finmark Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant
versus
Dilip Kumar and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO.6 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.14 OF 2026
Macrotech Developers Ltd. … Appellant
versus
Surendra Gauri Shankar and Ors. … Respondents
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 19 JUNE 2026
SUO MOTU SPEAKING TO THE MINUTES OF ORDER
DATED 17 JUNE 2026
SSP 1/2
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
25 sa 5 of 2026-2.doc
1. In clause (viii) of the operative part, ‘six months’ be corrected to read as
‘60 days’.
2. Rest of the order remains unaltered.
3. Original order dated 17 June 2026 be corrected and uploaded
accordingly.
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
SSP 2/2
Signed by: S.S.Phadke
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 23/06/2026 11:37:27
Checking your session…