Bombay High Court
BABU ALIAS DHONDU LAXMAN PADWALversusSHANKAR GENU PADWAL AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The appeal was dismissed for non‑prosecution because the appellant failed to appear.
Summary
The appellant, Swapnil Babu alias Dhondu Laxman Padwal, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple scheduled dates for his second appeal against Shankar Genu Padwal and others. The court had previously adjourned the appeal on at least four occasions due to the appellant's non‑appearance. On 10 April 2026, the court issued a final warning, listing the appeal for dismissal on 23 April 2026 and stating that any further failure to appear would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. The appellant again failed to appear on the stipulated date. Consequently, the court dismissed the second appeal for non‑prosecution and, as a result, disposed of the related civil application as infructuous.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- appeal
- infructuous
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:19572
5-SA-564-1998.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 564 OF 1998
Swapnil
Babu Alias Dhondu Laxman Padwal. … Appellant
Vs.
Shankar Genu Padwal And Ors. … Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10462 OF 1998
None for the appellant.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 23rd APRIL 2026
ORDER :
1. Since none had appeared for the appellant for last
many dates, following order was passed on 10th April 2026 :-
“1. None had appeared for the appellant on various dates.
Since none had appeared, this court had adjourned the
appeal at least on last four dates. Even today none appears
for the appellant.
2. By way of last chance to the appellant, list the second
appeal on 23rd April 2026. To be listed under the caption ‘for
dismissal’.
3. It is clarified that if none appears for the appellant on
1/2
5-SA-564-1998.docx
the next date, the second appeal will be dismissed fro non
prosecution.”
2. Even today none appears for the appellant.
3. The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. In view of dismissal of the second appeal, the civil
application is disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Checking your session…