Bombay High Court
MESSERS BARUN INVESTMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITEDversusNATIONAL ADVERTISING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- RAJESH S PATIL
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as per the consent terms dated 9 April 2026.
Summary
Messrs Barun Investment Company Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against National Advertising Services Private Limited and other respondents. Both parties appeared before the Court and submitted consent terms dated 9 April 2026, which were identified and accepted by the Court. The consent terms contained undertakings that were treated as binding on the parties. The Court, after verifying the signatures and the consent, recorded the terms and ordered that the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with the consent. Consequently, the petition was closed without further adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' consent terms
Subjects
- consent order
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:19672
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
4 WRIT PETITION NO. 1002/2005
MESSERS BARUN INVESTMENT
COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED ..PETITIONER
VS
NATIONAL ADVERTISING SERVICES
PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.. ..RESPONDENTS
------------
Adv. G. H. Keluskar for petitioner.
Adv. Akshay Deshmukh a/w. Adv. Sanket Kadam for respondents.
Mr. Kailash Bagiri, authorised representative of Barun Investment
Private Ltd. present.
Mr. Yogesh Jain and Mr. Puja Jain, Directors of respondent no.1 –
National Advertising Services Pvt. Ltd. present.
Mr. Rajesh Jain, Director of respondent no.1 - National Advertising
Services Pvt. Ltd., respondent no.2 - Advertising Films of India,
Respondent No.3 – New World Publication and respondent no.4 –
A.F.I. Feather, present.
------------
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 23 APRIL 2026.
P.C. :
1) The parties have tendered the consent terms dated 9/4/2026
along with enclosures.
2) Learned counsel for the parties submit that their respective
clients are present in the Court. They identified the signatures of their
respective clients on the consent terms and on the documents
attached to the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record
1
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
and marked ‘X’ for identification purpose.
3) The statements made in the consent terms are accepted as
undertakings given to this Court. All undertakings are accepted. For
ease of reference, a scanned copy of the consent terms is reproduced
herein below:-
2
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
3
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
4
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
5
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
6
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
7
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
8
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
9
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
10
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
11
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
12
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
13
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
14
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
15
Diksha Rane 4 WP 1002 2005.doc
4) The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the consent
terms dated 9/4/2026.
(Rajesh S. Patil, J.)
16
Signed by: Diksha Rane
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 25/04/2026 13:50:09
Checking your session…