Bombay High Court
KHALIL BEG HUSAIN BEGversusSHANTABAI PRALHAD SINGH LODHI AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the substantive dispute had already been decided in the regular civil appeal.
Summary
The petitioner, Khalil Beg Husain Beg, filed a writ petition (No. 10130 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil appeal (No.3/2015) pending before the District Judge‑2, Bhusawal, was decided on 2 January 2019, a fact confirmed by the petitioner’s counsel. Since the substantive matter before the writ petition had already been resolved by the appellate decision, there was nothing left for the High Court to consider. Consequently, the Court held that the writ petition was infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.
Issues considered
- The petition remained maintainable after the regular civil appeal was decided?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous petition
- civil appeal
- procedural disposal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24928
10130.2015WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
933 WRIT PETITION NO. 10130 OF 2015
KHALIL BEG HUSAIN BEG
VERSUS
SHANTABAI PRALHAD SINGH LODHI AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Deshmukh N.E.
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Karan V. Sarosiya h/f Mr. S.S. Bora
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] The report of Resource Personnel shows that
during the pendency of this petition, Regular Civil Appeal
No.3/2015 pending before District Judge-2, Bhusawal itself
is decided by judgment and order dated 02.01.2019. The said
fact is confirmed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…