Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
210 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4053 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested the unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The Court considered the …
The petitioners, Ashok Arjunrao Khillare and others, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition sought relief concerning an order of contempt. The petitioners later informed the Court that they had complied with the contempt order. On this basis, the …
Prashant Dagdu Warkari filed a contempt petition against Pradeep Vyas, Secretary of the Public Health Department, alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioner sought relief on the ground that the order remained unexecuted. Counsel for the petitioner, A. N. Deshpande, appearing …
M/s Arshi Builder and Developer, through its partner Dattatraya Devram Khandekar, filed Writ Petition No. 665 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later submitted a communication dated 12 March 2026 seeking the …
The petitioner, Vithoba Laxman Mhaske, filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO.1948 OF 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner died in 2023. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the death. The court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Madhukar Ingole, filed a contempt petition challenging an order that directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide his caste validation claim and ordered provisional regularisation of his services subject to a caste validation certificate. The respondent State, through its AGP, …
Gopal Mareppa Kamble filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of leave encashment and cash arrears under the 7th Pay Scale. The respondents, including the Education Officer, submitted that a proposal on the payment would be decided within four weeks and the petitioner …
The petitioner, Datta Baswantrao Patil, filed a writ petition alleging that a revision application (Revision No.708/2015) pending before the State of Maharashtra had not been decided for 11 years. The petitioner sought direction for the respondent to decide the revision promptly. The High Court …
The petitioner, Kishanrao Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Udgir, challenged the order dated 08.08.2024 in which its proposal for the transfer of an Ashram school was rejected on the ground of four deficiencies. The petitioner remedied all the deficiencies and communicated the compliance to the Additional …
The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon was subject to a bailable warrant in a contempt petition for allegedly not complying with the court's directions. The petitioner’s proposal, which had been pending, was finally decided on the same day the warrant was issued, and the court …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the alleged contempt orders had been complied with. The court examined the submissions and found no basis to continue the …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the alleged contempt orders had been complied with. The court examined the submissions and found no basis to continue the …
Multiple petitioners filed contempt petitions (Nos. 90, 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104 of 2020) against Uday Chaudhari and another, alleging non‑compliance with earlier court orders. The petitioners, through counsel Sanket S. Joshi, submitted that the contempt orders had been fully complied with. …
The petitioners, Chhotulal Magan Pawar and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later informed the Court that they had received the benefits under the second A.C.P. scheme. On this basis, the petitioners submitted that there was no longer any cause of action. …
The State of Maharashtra challenged a Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal order that quashed a departmental refusal to grant advance increments to employee Pralhad Bhalerao. The State argued that a pending departmental enquiry and a reprimand under Government Resolution 14.12.2006, clause 8(b), …
The petitioners, non‑teaching staff of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14‑03‑2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 01‑01‑2024. They argued that the resolution was …
Ajay Sunil Nainwad filed a contempt petition (No. 307 of 2026) against Dinesh B. Tidke, Joint Commissioner. The petitioner alleged that an order under contempt had been breached. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Yashraj D. Joshi, submitted that the order had been complied with. The court considered …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to measure a parcel of land (Gat No. 106) that had been acquired for a road project. The land was taken into possession in August 1979, with acquisition notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and a final …
The petitioner, Sunil Punaji Dabhade, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Education Officer (Respondent No.2) decide his representation dated 04.01.2021 within a reasonable time. The petitioner argued that the representation was pending without decision. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Siddharth Sanjay Bopalkar, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The core issue was whether, after the faceless reassessment scheme introduced on 29‑03‑2022, the JAO retained …
The petitioner, Shaikh Chand, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition could no longer be considered. The Court held that the death of the petitioner extinguished the petition’s …
The petitioners sought inclusion of their names in the seniority list of village‑panchayat employees to be appointed in Class‑III/IV cadres of the Zilla Parishad, along with age‑relaxation appointment orders. They argued that the Zilla Parishad had failed to fill 10% reserved posts since 2015 and …
The petitions were filed by teachers and the management of Dnyan Sandeep Shikshan Sanstha against each other concerning disputes in the education sector. While the writ petitions were pending, the parties negotiated and reached an amicable settlement, the terms of which were placed on record. The …
The petitioners, Sudam Dhondiram Rathod and others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to pay compensation for their lands acquired at Khoradsawangi, Jalna, alleging that the interest component of the awarded compensation was not paid. The State, through its …
The petitioner, Dhanashree Madhukar Gaikwad, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09.12.2022 issued by the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, which rejected his proposal for appointment. The petitioner contended that neither he nor the management were given an opportunity …
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant‑in‑aid similar to that granted to another institution. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25‑05‑2021, which, however, stipulated that such grants could be decided only after the Finance Department’s …
The petitioner, Radheshyam Bhagwat Sonawane, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a punishment order. During the pendency of the petition, he pursued an alternate remedy by directly challenging the punishment order in the appropriate forum. The petitioner’s counsel submitted …
The petitioner, Pawandeep Singh Mahendrasingh Kohli, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning certain criminal cases. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Chatterji Joydeep, informed the Court that the criminal cases in question had already …
The petitioner sought to bring the heirs and legal representatives of petitioner No.3 into the pending writ petition (WP/11831/2019). The High Court considered the application and, for the reasons stated in the application, allowed it. The Court directed that the necessary amendment to include the …
The petitioners, Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision. While the case was pending, the petitioners received an award and decided to withdraw the petition, communicating this to their counsel on 5 March …
The petitioners, Manik Deorao Bargaje and another, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners did not appear before the Court. The Attorney General for the State informed the Court that respondent No.4 had deposited Rs.5,48,134 in the account of petitioner No.2, …
The petitioners, Rajendra Vithal Kunte and another, filed a petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been previously imposed on the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel, …
The petitioner, Santosh alias SANTAJI Vishwasra Kokate, filed a writ petition seeking permission to file a fresh application under section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (M.R.T.P.) Act for acquisition of land. The petitioner argued that the development plan for the area was …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of contempt petitions numbered 57/2023, 673/2023, 258/2024, 393/2023, 260/2024, 259/2024, 86/2024, 87/2024 and 897/2024. The petitioners submitted that the orders issued in the earlier contempt proceedings had been fully complied with. The Court …
The petitioner, Uttam Kisan Shinde, filed Writ Petition No. 7371 of 2022 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later approached the Court, through counsel, requesting permission to withdraw the petition. The Court …
The petitioners, Sonai Magasvargiya Audhyogic Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha and its president K.G. Thorat, filed a continuous petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The court had earlier passed an order of contempt against the petitioners. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, …
The applicant, a child in conflict with law, was convicted of murdering his father by assault with a dumbbell and stabbing with a knife, and sentenced to life imprisonment under IPC Section 302. He filed an application for bail pending his appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in its …
The petitioner, Vinit Vishweshwar Kahalekar, challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. which held that after the faceless reassessment …
Syed Nazem Syed Azam filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra, including the removal of certain office objections. The applicant, represented by Advocate Ashok Gaikwad, argued that the objections were unwarranted and …
Petitioner Triveni Keshav Bhange filed Writ Petition No. 3509 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether a petitioner …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed the writ petition (WP/2844/2024) for further consideration on 22 June 2026. The court also ordered that the accompanying civil application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4174 OF 2026) be disposed of. No substantive merits of the petition were discussed in the …
The Union of India filed a civil application seeking to vacate an ad‑interim relief that had been granted in a writ petition filed by Shirdi Country Inns Private Ltd., which restrained the Union from taking coercive action pending the writ. The Union argued that the relief prevented it from …
The petitioner, Shrinivas Gulabrao Adhav, filed a writ petition seeking certain benefits. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that an order dated 1 February 2023 had already conferred all the claimed benefits on him. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in continuing the petition …
The petitioner, Ambadas Jotiba Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency, the petitioner informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court’s resource personnel report dated 03‑07‑2026 confirmed this status. …
Ravindra Hirnalal Madavgate filed Writ Petition No. 5160 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Patil Indrale Anand Vinayakrao, filed a Vakalatnama, resulting in the discharge of …
Petitioner Minhaj Ahmed Taj Ahemed Hashmi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the respondent counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had already been …
The accused Ramesh Bhagwan Munde and Amol (applicants) were convicted of murder, abetment of suicide and a common intention offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. They filed a bail application claiming procedural irregularities such as a discrepancy in …
The petitioner, Tarachand Yamaji Mitkar, filed a writ petition (902 WRIT PETITION NO. 14457 OF 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondent State was represented by Shri S. R. Wakale, Additional Government Pleader. On 14 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 468, 469 and 470 of 2019) filed by Ashok, Pratap and Subhash respectively against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners submitted purshis dated 24‑02‑2020 stating that they had already received the …
The applicants, Vitthal Parvati Bhagat and others, filed a writ petition (Stamp No.23751 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was delayed, and the respondents raised objections to the filing. The Court, …
The petitioner, Vandana Limbarao Ingle, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to ensure effective investigation into two offences, Crime No.27/2019 and Crime No.72/2019, alleged to have been committed in Satara. The State filed a miscellaneous application (M.A. …
The petitioners, Laxmibai Pandurang More and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 273 of 2018) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition arose from an order of contempt that had been directed against the petitioners. The petitioners, through counsel Abhijit S. More, informed the …
The petitioner, Anil Laxman Joshi, filed a contempt petition challenging an order. The petitioner’s counsel, P. B. Salunke on behalf of Mr. Salgare Vitthal G., submitted that the contempt order had been complied with. The court examined the compliance and found no remaining issue. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Uttam Karbhari Golwad, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Scrutiny Committee, Nashik, had unduly delayed deciding his tribe claim. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, informed the Court that the claim was still …
Vaishnavi, daughter of Sanjay Suryawanshi, filed Contempt Petition No. 265 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against Kiran Mali and another. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Nikita B. Bontalwar and Advocate O. B. Boinwad. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner …
Petitioner Baburao Namdeo Kirage filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department (Respondent No. 2) to pay compensation for land (Gut No. 156) as per an award dated 15‑02‑2024, together with interest. The respondent’s Advocate General produced a …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Aradhana Arvind Deshmukh as an Assistant Professor on an ad‑hoc basis. The petition alleged that the appointment was a back‑door entry and sought regularisation of the post. The High Court referred to its earlier …
The appellants Vaibhav Govind Dhage and others were arrested in connection with a criminal case. Their counsel sought the High Court’s permission to withdraw the pending criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The bench, presided over by Justice Vaishali Patil‑Jadhav, considered the …
Tulsi Electroinfra Pvt Ltd and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, …
The applicant, Kashabai Dhondiba Rathod, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly holding the victim, Vinod, thereby enabling another accused to deliver a fatal knife blow. She appealed for suspension of the sentence and bail, arguing that her role was limited to …
The petitioner, Rauf Nyaju Patel, filed a contempt petition against Rajesh Agrawal and others, alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The learned Government Pleader informed the court that the contempt order had been complied with by concluding the departmental enquiry, and the …
Santosh Pandit Rathod filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others for not deciding his representation dated 9 April 2021. The petitioner alleged that the respondents had failed to consider his representation on its merits, violating …
The petitioner, Jameel Khan Rasool Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the police officer of Kranti Chowk Police Station to execute a conviction warrant issued by the JMFC 16th Court on 08.02.2016. The petitioner alleged that the police officer was not complying with the …
The appellant, Dr. Prajwalit Raut, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench challenging a family court order. The court noted that the appellant failed to appear and that the notice issued to the respondent, Priyanka Raut, could not be served because the parties had resumed …
Vasant Shankarrao Kulkarni filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 575 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. At the request of the petitioner's …
The petitioners, Megha Madhukar Lahankar and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Yogesh Dharmadhikar, appearing on behalf of Mr. A.G. …
The petitioners, Samshar alias Nandad Ramesh Bhosle and others, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge sheet was filed against them. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. C.C. Deshpande, sought permission to withdraw the bail …
Shaikh Harun Shaikh Sagir Ahmed filed a contempt petition challenging a circular dated 06‑04‑2017 (No. 344) alleging it contravened the High Court's order dated 04‑03‑2016 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1368 of 2015. The Court examined the 2016 order and found that it contained no specific directions …
Several writ petitions were filed by individual petitioners challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that the matter was already decided by a Full Bench of this Court in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan Vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) SCC Online Bom 729, a decision that is …
The petitioner, Khalil Beg Husain Beg, filed a writ petition (No. 10130 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil appeal (No.3/2015) pending before the District Judge‑2, Bhusawal, was decided on 2 January 2019, a fact confirmed by the …
The petitioner, Abrar Muktar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to arrest accused persons in two crimes, to transfer the investigations to an independent agency, and to provide protection and departmental action against police officials. The respondents …
The Aurangabad bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a review application filed by Pandurang Narayan Patil, who contested a prior order that incorrectly stated he had superannuated. Patil sought to recall that statement and obtain the same relief granted to other petitioners in related writ …
The petitioners filed multiple contempt petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, asserting that they had complied with the orders previously issued in each case. The petitioners, through counsel, submitted that compliance was complete for petitions numbered 57/2023, 673/2023, …
Ravi filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against a decree involving Sadhana. During the hearing, the appellant, through his counsel Mr. A.R. Gaikwad, submitted a written instruction dated 16‑06‑2026 expressing his desire to withdraw the appeal. The court recorded the …
The petitioner, Narayan Harishchandra Gite, filed a writ petition seeking his transfer from an unaided assistant teacher post to an aided post in a school managed by respondent No.5. The respondents had already appointed another candidate who had passed the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) and argued …
The Bombay High Court heard Contempt Petition No. 114 of 2024 filed by Geetabai against the State of Maharashtra and its Water Resources Department. The contempt order required the respondent‑acquiring body to deposit the full compensation awarded. The body deposited only 50 % of the amount and …
Laxmanrao Nanasaheb Pawar filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution filed the charge sheet. The applicant's counsel, Mr. A.B. Pakhe, requested permission to withdraw the bail …
Anand Ambadas Phalkar filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra but delayed filing it by 106 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay through Criminal Application No. 1878 of 2026. The court examined the reasons provided in the application and determined that the delay …
The petitioners, eight primary education officers, filed a writ petition seeking orders for their transfers to non‑tribal areas. The respondents produced a communication from the Education Officer indicating eligibility for transfer but no formal order had been issued. They also submitted a …
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking modification of an order dated 05.05.2026 that had directed Dr. Devashish Ruikar, a neuro‑physician, to be a member of a Medical Board for examining Respondent No. 5. The learned Additional Government Pleader argued that an outside …
The appellant, Priyanka, filed a Family Court Appeal which was found to be within the prescribed time limit. The respondent filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay for the appeal. The court examined the office note confirming the timely filing of the appeal. Since the appeal was …
The petitioner, Bharde Saksharata Prasarak Mandal Shevgaon, filed a writ petition challenging the delay by the Education Officer (Primary) in deciding a proposal dated 27 December 2018. The petition alleged that the prolonged inaction violated statutory duties and the petitioner’s rights. The High …
The petitioner, Savita Parshuram Paratwad, filed a contempt petition (No. 584 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. T.S. Kotkar, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court held that there was no longer any …
The applicants filed two civil applications seeking to recall a court order dated 09/10/2024 that directed the Tahsildar, Nanded to decide on a representation filed on 22/08/2024. The order required a decision within three months, which was not initially taken, leading to a contempt petition; …
The petitioner, Pramod Deelip Kshirsagar, filed a writ petition (No. 5582 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the submission that the petition was no …
The petitioner, Anand Kashiram Sapkale, received salary arrears as per the 7th Pay Commission after a two‑year delay and sought interest on the delayed payment. The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The Court noted the petitioner's claim and directed him to make a …
Vinod Arjun Wagh, an expelled member of a private association (Respondent No.4), filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to conclude an action he claimed had been initiated through several communications between 2020 and 2021. He relied on the decision in Board of …
The petitioner, Indira Gandhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Government to include the village of Hasnabad in the perspective plan for the academic year 2020‑2021. The Court noted that the perspective plan is a five‑year document whose term, commencing in …
Bhanudas, son of Shriram Uttwar, filed Writ Petition No. 6956 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Amol Ashok Kokad, later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (924 WRIT PETITION NO. 6801 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief related to Regular Civil Suit No.45/2013 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bhokardan. The petition alleged that the civil suit was still pending …
The petitioner, a charitable trust, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a 2010 Board Resolution and allotment letter by CIDCO that allocated a plot in New Aurangabad to another trust (Respondent No.3) and to have the plot allotted to the petitioner instead. The petitioner argued that its …
The petition was filed by the father of a 34‑year‑old woman with moderate intellectual disability who was sexually assaulted and is pregnant at 28 weeks. The petitioner sought an emergency medical board and permission for termination of pregnancy beyond the 24‑week limit, along with preservation of …
The petitioner, Triambak Kisan Randhavane, filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was concurrently pending in a regular civil suit (No. 883/2012) before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rahata. During the pendency of the writ petition, the civil suit was disposed of on 28 August …
The petitioners, owners of several beer bars and permit rooms, filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. They argued that the denial was arbitrary. The State contended that the petitions were no longer viable due to the lapse of time and subsequent …
A series of writ petitions (WP 5478/19 to WP 5487/19) were filed by various beer bar proprietors seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents concerning the grant of licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy …
A series of writ petitions (WP 5478/19 to WP 5487/19) were filed by various proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms in Maharashtra challenging the grant of licences. The petitioners argued that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy rendered their petitions ineffective. The …
A group of beer bar proprietors filed multiple writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant or renew licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent policy changes rendered their petitions ineffective. The Court examined …
Several proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms filed writ petitions (Nos. 5504‑5511 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in the law regarding liquor …
Several beer bar proprietors filed writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) in the Bombay High Court challenging the denial or conditions of their liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy rendered their petitions ineffective. The State …
The appellant filed a Family Court Appeal seeking relief, but the parties subsequently settled their dispute and obtained a divorce by mutual consent. The appellant's counsel, on instructions, moved the court to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the amicable settlement and the mutual consent …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 12 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the administrative authority was obligated to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 2 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the …
A series of writ petitions (Nos. 5458‑5467 of 2019) were filed by proprietors of various hotels and beer bars in Aurangabad seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra concerning liquor licences. The petitioners argued that, owing to a change in government policy and the law governing the grant …
The appellant, X.Y.Z., filed a complaint alleging that on 5 June 2016 the accused entered her home, assaulted her mother with an iron rod, pressed her breast, tore her clothes and threatened them. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution evidence unreliable. On appeal, the High …
The petitioner, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since October 2025. He needed the decision before the NEET 2027 examination. The State, …
The petitioner, Ravindra Prakash Gavali, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, a claim he had submitted on 23‑12‑2016. He argued that without a validity certificate, his employer would withhold …
Petitioner Kailas Sundarrao Sudewad filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe be decided promptly, arguing that the lack of a validity certificate was preventing his promotion. The petitioner contended that the Scrutiny Committee had not …
Rajabhau alias Rajendra Digambar Mane filed a criminal writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the petitioner has a pending appeal before the In‑charge Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, scheduled for hearing on 14‑07‑2026. The learned Attorney …
The petitioner, a teacher, sought transfer on the ground that he has been serving in a difficult, hilly area since 2022, citing certificates from the Forest Department and Public Works Department indicating the presence of wild animals and a distance of more than 10 km from the nearest highway. The …
The petitioner, Junaid Ahmedkhan, filed writ petition No. 7000 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, through counsel Mr. G. B. Patunkar on behalf of Mr. Vibhute Sunil M., the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally. The sole question before the …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 79/2021 registered at Ardhapur Police Station and a restraining order against the respondents from filing a charge-sheet. The Court noted that, following the FIR, a criminal case (R.C.C. No. 131/2021) had already been …
Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees' Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …
Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …
The petitioner, a blind victim, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction for the police inspector to record her supplementary statement in Crime No.133 of 2026. The respondent State argued that such a direction could be issued to the investigating officer. The Court agreed, directing …
The petitioner, Nivruti Ramrao Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking appointment under the Project Affected Persons (PAP) reservation quota. Respondent No.2 argued that the petitioner’s mother had already been appointed under the same quota in 1990 and that the scheme permits only one appointment …
Bajirao Raghunath Vanjari filed writ petition No. 7704 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against respondents including Kevalbai Himatrao Patil. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil suit No. 3 of 2005, which was pending before the Civil Judge, Junior …
Petitioners, appointed before 1 November 2005, filed a writ petition seeking entitlement to the old pension scheme. They contended that the issue was under active consideration by the State and that a proposal had been submitted to the Education Officer. The petitioners requested permission to …
The petitioner, Sachin Panditro Shinde, filed a writ petition (No. 7233 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief arising from Civil Suit No. 145/2015 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule. The petitioner argued that the suit was still pending and that …
The petitioner, Rupanjali Narayanrao Kanchi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No. 4 to take a decision in accordance with a Government communication dated 01.01.2025. The petitioner had made a representation to respondent No. 4 on 09.01.2025 and alleged delay in decision. The …
The petitioners, Dhondiram Tulshiram Madale and another, filed a writ petition challenging actions in acquisition proceedings. They sought permission to withdraw the petition and later file an appropriate application after the first appeals by the claimants were decided, relying on a Supreme Court …
The petitioner, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., filed a writ petition (No. 6407 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the petition was pending, the trial court decided the underlying claim on 24 February 2025. The petitioner argued that the decision rendered the …
The petitioners challenged an office order that terminated their services for not acquiring a required qualification and removed one petitioner from a select list. They relied on earlier decisions of the Nagpur Bench in Writ Petition Nos. 3251/2021 and 1231/2022, where similarly situated candidates …
The petitioner, Arjun Uddhav Kale, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the filing of an ‘A’ Summary Report in FIR No. 30 of 2018 registered at Karjat Police Station. The investigating officer had submitted the summary report, which was pending before the competent court for final orders. The …
Petitioner Nirjala Punja... filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra alleging that the Scrutiny Committee failed to decide her proposal within the time limit prescribed by the Court. The Court noted that the Committee had been divided into two parts, which caused the delay, and …
The petitioners Sunil Jugraj Mutha and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging an unspecified matter against respondent Suresh Jugraj Mutha. While the petition was pending, the related Special Civil Suit No. 97/2007, pending before the Civil Judge, …
The petitioner, Uma Kalyansinha Rajput, filed a contempt petition (No. 579 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. T.S. Kotkar, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the court held that there was …
Dadabhau Vilas Shelke filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The application was filed after a delay, and the respondent State opposed condonation of the delay. The court examined whether the delay could be justified …
The High Court noted that the Scrutiny Committee, tasked by an earlier contempt order to determine the petitioners' caste claims, failed to decide within the prescribed time. The State’s Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the Vigilance Cell report was still pending, requiring at …
The Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) Ausa, represented by its Vice Chairman, filed writ petition No. 5769 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was pending when the relevant elections …
The petitioner, Ganesh Mahadeo Pawar, filed two criminal writ petitions (Nos. 1000 and 1017 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw petition No. 1017, which the court accepted, resulting in its withdrawal and disposal. The court then …
The Islahul Banat Urdu Secondary and Higher Secondary School filed a writ petition (No. 9117 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, represented by Adv. Jadhavar Santosh S., sought relief against the State and other …
The petitioner, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Samajik Vikas Sanstha, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to release grants and rent for a backward girls’ hostel it runs. The State’s Attorney General indicated that an order on the matter had already been issued on 2 January …
Kunal Mohanrao Kale filed a contempt petition (No. 713 of 2025) against Ranjitsinh Krushnaji Nimbalkar in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the order passed under contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and …
The petitioner, Sunita Shinde, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of FIR No. 113/2020 registered at Kurunda Police Station, Hingoli. The Court examined a report from its Resource Personnel dated 05.08.2026, which indicated that a Special Case No. 20/2021 had already …
The petitioners, M/s Amar Technocraft and its proprietor, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRAT) in Securitisation Application No.36/2019, contending that the Chairperson of the DRAT was unavailable at the time of the order. They sought permission to withdraw …
The petitioner, a retired primary teacher, challenged a 2017 recovery order that sought to deduct Rs. 2,88,946 from his pension on the ground that he had received increments despite not obtaining a B.Ed. qualification. The petitioner argued that the pay scales for graduate primary teachers and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order, but counsel submitted that the underlying regular civil suit (No. 288/2013) had already been decided by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur on 10 April 2018. The court considered whether the writ petition remained maintainable …
Samartha Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd, through its Chief Executive Officer, filed writ petition No. 10142 of 2015 challenging a Special Darkhast (No. 24/2014) pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule. During the pendency of the petition, the Special Darkhast was dismissed for default by order …
Samartha Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd, through its CEO, filed writ petition No. 10234 of 2015 challenging a Special Darkhast (no.23/2014) pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule. During the pendency of the petition, the Special Darkhast was dismissed for default by order dated 16 July 2022, …
Arvind Uddhav Deshpande filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15 July 2013 passed by the 4th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Osmanabad in Regular Civil Suit No. 583/2012. While the writ petition was pending, the underlying civil suit was finally decided by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior …
The petitioner, Pralhad Jadhav, filed a criminal writ petition which, on his counsel’s instruction, was reported to have become infructuous. The court, after confirming the Resource Personnel’s report dated 03‑07‑2026, held that the petition stands disposed. No substantive factual or legal issues …
M/s. Bhagyalaxmi Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as …
The Maharashtra Rajya Kharedi Vikri Sangathana filed writ petition No. 10697 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to the Transport Commissioner to decide on a representation it had sent via email on 13 July 2021. The petitioner alleged that the respondents had …
Petitioner Sharda Rajendra Aajbe filed a contempt petition (No. 572 of 2019) against the Secretary of the Maharashtra State Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting this …
The petitioner, Jyoti Namdevrao More, filed a contempt petition challenging the alleged non‑compliance of a court direction to the Education Officer (Primary) to decide his proposal dated 26‑02‑2018. The court examined the order dated 24‑10‑2019, which showed that the Education Officer had indeed …
In a family court appeal, the appellant (husband) sought leave to withdraw the appeal on the basis that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and intended to live separately. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed. The court …
The petitioner, Govind Taterao Suryawanshi, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent (the court handling his appeal) to decide his pending appeal, which has been outstanding since 14 July 2026. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in the disposal of the appeal. …
Petitioners Vasant Atamaram Bhise and others filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents filed a reply stating that they had complied with the contempt order. The petitioners, through counsel, sought further relief. The Court examined the compliance claim and found it …
Anju alias Anjana RanjU Tambe filed Writ Petition No. 10082 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of Respondent No.4 in deciding representations submitted on 21-12-2009, 26-04-2023 and 02-05-2023. The petition sought a directive compelling the respondent to …
Several groups of applicants filed writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. The petitions were challenged on procedural grounds, including alleged delay in filing, errors in the prayer clause, and pending office …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a series of civil applications (writ petitions) filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari, assisted by Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the State was represented …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a batch of civil applications filed as writ petitions by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. S. U. Chaudhari on behalf of Mr. M. R. Suryawanshi, while the respondents were represented …
A series of writ petitions (Civil Applications No. 9095-9114 of 2025) were filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The petitions had been delayed, and the respondents raised office objections. The High Court, exercising its inherent powers, condoned the delay, ordered the …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay entertained a series of civil applications and writ petitions filed by various applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought relief including correction of the prayer clause and removal of office objections. The respondents raised …
Pandit Rupchand Imale filed a writ petition challenging the denial of benefits under the old pension scheme, contending that his appointment dated 01‑09‑2004 predates the November 2005 cutoff for the new scheme. The petitioner argued that he should be allowed to claim the old pension benefits. The …
Shirdi Nagar Panchayat filed a contempt petition alleging that land owners had violated an interim order dated 25 April 2018, which restrained any physical development on disputed open and amenity plots. The interim order was issued in the original Writ Petition No. 3805 of 2018, which, along with …
The petitioners, BHAURAO SHRIPATI PAWAR alias POKALE and another, filed a contempt petition seeking rental compensation. The respondents submitted an affidavit indicating that interest under Sections 34 and 28 had already been paid to the farmers, rendering them ineligible for further rental …
The petitioners challenged a Tahsildar's order that granted them insufficient compensation of Rs.10,000 per hectare for crop loss caused by heavy rainfall in 2020. They argued that their lands, cultivated with lemon and mango trees, are multiple‑year (bagayat) crops and that the damage exceeded the …
The petitioners, Arjun Ashokkumar Bhutda and others, filed a writ petition seeking compensation, three times the market value of the land (TDR), and the RCC structure for land acquired by the corporation. The respondents (Corporation) contended that the petitioners' residential construction was …
The petitioner, Ayesha Parveen, sought the quashing of an order dated 26‑04‑2023 issued by the Education Officer that denied her appointment and salary arrears, and also sought a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Education to grant her ID and arrears. The Zilla Parishad argued that no posts …
The applicants filed two civil applications seeking to recall the High Court's order dated 09‑10‑2024 in Writ Petition No.11267/2024, which had directed the Tahsildar to decide on a representation filed on 22‑08‑2024 within three months. After a contempt petition, the authorities eventually decided …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order to restart the TB Sanatorium Hospital run by the Indian Red Cross Society in Ahmednagar and to decide service benefit claims of ex‑employees whose services were terminated due to the hospital's closure. The District …
The petitioners, non‑teaching employees of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools in Maharashtra, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14 March 2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 1 January 2024. They argued that …
The petitioner filed an RTI application for information on Primary/Secondary Ashram Schools, but the Public Information Officer directed him to approach each school separately and the petitioner did not receive the information. He appealed to the first appellate authority under Section 19(1) of the …
In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The learned Additional Government Pleader initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced …
The petitioners, Nilesh Rajendra Tarkase and another, filed a contempt petition in 2017 but failed to engage any counsel despite ample opportunity. The Court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
Sharda Rajendra Aajbe filed a contempt petition against the Secretary of the Maharashtra State Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting compliance, disposed of the contempt petition …
The petitioner, Jitendra Balasaheb Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging a 20 September 2021 order that rejected his application for the transfer of respondent No. 3. The petition was never circulated after filing, and the court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in prosecuting …
Akbar Khan Karim Khan filed Writ Petition No. 11590 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. During the proceedings, the …
The petition (Contempt Petition No. 983 of 2025) was filed by Ravindra Dhondu Gawali against Minal Karanwal. The petitioner sought relief from an order of contempt that had been previously issued. The respondent/State was represented by Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar and the other respondents by Mr. V.V. Gujar. …
Madhukar Sudhakar Puri filed a civil writ petition (No. 1511 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the Union of India and others. The petition had been delayed, and the respondents raised objections. The Court, after hearing, decided to condone the delay and restored the writ …
The petitioner, Bhaskar Eknath Badak, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb him as a permanent Gram Rojgar Sevak. The Court examined whether temporary workers under the Gram Rojgar scheme acquire a right to permanent appointment. Relying on its earlier …
The petitioner, a doctor, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.4) to remove encroachments on municipal land and a municipal road in Shrigonda. He alleged that despite his representation, the corporation had only removed encroachments of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the State to acquire their lands as per proposals dated 26/03/2015 and to pay compensation. The respondents submitted an affidavit stating that the acquisition process is proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, with …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a series of contempt petitions (Nos. 57/2023, 673/2023, 258/2024, 393/2023, 260/2024, 259/2024, 86/2024, 87/2024 and 897/2024) arising from various civil matters. Petitioners submitted that they had complied with the orders previously issued in …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the Pharmacy Council of India. The court noted that, due to the passage of time, the petitions had become infructuous. No substantive merits were addressed. Consequently, the court disposed of all the writ petitions as infructuous.
The applicants, Subhash Tukappa Hirmukhe and others, filed a writ petition (No. 7512 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought reliefs specified in prayer clauses B and C, but the filing was delayed. The respondents …
Vinod Premchand Surana filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme …
Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt Ltd, through its director, challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment …
Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt Ltd challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme came into …
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent Gram Rojgar Sevaks. The Court noted that the petitioners were appointed only on a temporary scheme and had not been appointed to a …
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure, who had been employed on a temporary Gram Rojgar Sevak scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent employees. The High Court examined whether a temporary appointment …
The Dnyan Sandeep Shikshan Sanstha, representing teachers and management, filed writ petitions against the Education Officer (Primary) of Z.P. Aurangabad and against Omprakash Sanjabrao Sawadatkar, alleging disputes related to their employment and administration. A third petition was filed by the …
The petitioner, Sanvar Baig Shabbir Baig, filed Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel D. K. Dagadkhair, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioner, Rajendra Raghunagh Majkuri, filed writ petition No. 4748 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mr. Syed Masood Chand, while the State was represented by Mr. A. V. …
Gangabai Pralhadrao Jamble filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Kishanrao Dhondiram Tainak and others. While the petition was pending, a related Special Civil Suit No.58 of 2011, pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, …
The petitioner, Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule, filed writ petition No. 13342 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years, and by the time of hearing in March 2026, the …
The petitioner, Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule, filed writ petition No. 13344 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No substantive facts or relief sought are recorded in the judgment. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Amol Dayanbarao Ghuge, filed two writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Chief Executive Officers of Zilla Parishads in Ahmednagar and Hingoli. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw both petitions. The Court, after hearing counsel, …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the State of Maharashtra to implement a 2017 Government Resolution/Circular requiring schools to prepare a new seniority list of teachers and to halt promotions based on the old list. They also asked for cancellation of promotions made since 2014 on the basis …
The petitioner, Sachin Vyankatrao Keshavshetty, filed a criminal writ petition against the Collector, Osmanabad. The High Court observed that the petition could not be entertained because a related civil suit (R.C.S. No. 467 of 2016) was pending. The petitioner failed to clarify the status of that …
In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The Attorney General initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced receipts (identified as …
Yogirao Nivrutti Gawandi filed a contempt petition (No. 817 of 2019) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that an order of contempt had been passed against the State. The petitioner’s counsel, R. V. Gunale, submitted that the State had complied with the contempt order. The bench …
The appellants, Dnyaneshwar and Bhagwan Gaddime, were convicted for murder and dowry death under Sections 302 and 498‑A IPC based primarily on two dying declarations of the victim, Mahadevi. The defence argued that the first declaration was recorded 18 hours after admission, was not in the victim's …
The petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner in the Backward Class Cell, was transferred to the post of Deputy Election Officer in Parbhani, but upon arrival the post was found to be non‑vacant, preventing him from joining. He approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal seeking a stay of the …
The petitioner, Venkatesh Bapurao Kulkarni, filed Contempt Petition No. 843 of 2019 against Osmanabad District Central Co‑op Bank Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The Court, after hearing the submission, held that there was no longer …
The petitioners, non‑teaching employees of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools in Maharashtra, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14‑03‑2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 01‑01‑2024. They argued that the …
