Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
210 judgments · newest first · showing 201–210
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant‑in‑aid similar to that granted to another institution. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25‑05‑2021, which, however, stipulated that any such grant could be decided only after the Finance Department’s …
The petitioners, a group of primary Ashram schools, filed writ petitions seeking grant-in-aid comparable to that granted to Mauli Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sanstha. They relied on a Government Resolution dated 25/05/2021, which, however, stipulated that any grant-in-aid decision could only be made after …
The petitioner, Prashant Bharat Kshirsagar, filed a continuous petition seeking relief concerning arrears of salary. The High Court directed the respondent State of Maharashtra to pay the arrears. On 20 June 2026, the petitioner submitted a communication confirming receipt of the salary arrears in …
Petitioner Rajendra Bapurao Hande filed a contempt petition alleging that Respondent No.2 violated an interim order dated 5 September 2019 by issuing a letter on 13 September 2019 allotting a retail outlet to the original Respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No. 9974 of 2019. Respondent No.2 contended …
The petitioner, Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe, challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. which held that after the faceless reassessment …
Petitioner Harinath Sangramappa challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme came into …
The petitioners, Subhash and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to initiate action against the petitioner's son and daughter‑in‑law. The High Court had previously examined the petition and, on 2 February 2021, observed that the relief sought could not be granted in the …
Shreekshetra Mahurgad Vikas Mandal Nanded filed a civil application seeking relief from an order dated 02.12.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.9522 of 2014. The High Court examined the application and decided to recall the 2025 order, thereby restoring the writ petition to its original stage as it …
Shree Kshestra Mahurgad Vikas Mandal Mahur, through its President, filed an application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing a review application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the condonation. The central issue was …
The petitioners, Suhas Prabhakarrao Dharasurkar and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 105 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petitioners …
