Bombay High Court

SATISH RUPCHAND JAIN AND ANOTHERversusARUN BANSIDHAR SALI

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Satish Rupchand Jain and another, filed a writ petition which, according to their counsel, became infructuous. The learned advocate informed the court of this development. The bench, after noting the petition's infructuous status, ordered its disposal. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The case was concluded without any further directions.

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12206
                  Dilwale                                     1                   37-WP-10205-16.odt




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  37 WRIT PETITION NO. 10205 OF 2016

                                Satish Rupchand Jain And Another
                                               VERSUS
                                        Arun Bansidhar Sali
                                                 ...
             Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Waramaa B. R.
                                                 ...

                                       CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                       DATE          : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the petition has

             become infructuous.

             2.        In view thereof, petition is disposed of as infructuous.


                                                          [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                    JUDGE

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…