Bombay High Court
HARVINDAR SINGH RAGHVIR SINGH NIRHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition shall be dismissed for default if the petitioner fails to supply the requisite copies within the stipulated period.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, listed several writ petitions (Nos. 5374 of 2019, 1039 of 2020, 2398 of 2020, 4319 of 2020, 4331 of 2020, 4479 of 2020) involving various petitioners against Mahindra, the State of Maharashtra and a district cooperative bank. The petitioners were directed to furnish the requisite copies of documents within two weeks of the order. The Court further ordered that, upon receipt of the copies, fresh notices be issued to the respondents with a return date of four weeks thereafter. The Court warned that failure to supply the copies within the stipulated period would result in dismissal of the petition for default. No substantive merits of the petitions were addressed; the order dealt solely with procedural compliance.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners must supply the requisite copies of documents within the time prescribed by the Court
- Whether failure to comply warrants dismissal of the writ petitions for default
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- court procedure
- supply of documents
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
1 of 2 Sr. Nos-1004-1009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1004 WRIT PETITION NO. 5374 OF 2019
SITARAM BANSI DHUMAL
VERSUS
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD THROUGH
MANAGER AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Santosh S. Dambe, Advocate for the Petitioner.
…
AND
1005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1039 OF 2020
HARVINDAR SINGH RAGHVIR SINGH NIRH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. K. G. Narwade h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
…
AND
1006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2020
NITIN BHAUSAHEB MAGRE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Umesh A. Bhadgaonkar and Mr. Y. G. Sanchiti, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
…
AND
1007 WRIT PETITION NO. 4319 OF 2020
THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO
OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VERSUS
LAXMAN AMBAJI WAGHMARE AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
…
Tauseef
2 of 2 Sr. Nos-1004-1009
AND
1008 WRIT PETITION NO. 4331 OF 2020
THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO
OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VERSUS
NARAYAN GULABRAO NAYAK AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
…
AND
1009 WRIT PETITION NO. 4479 OF 2020
THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO
OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER
VERSUS
KESHAVRAO RAMRAO AMBHORE
...
Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C.:-
1. The Petitioner is directed to supply the requisite copies
within a period of two weeks from today.
2. Upon supply of the copies, issue fresh notice to the
Respondents, returnable four weeks thereafter.
3. If the copies are not supplied within the stipulated period,
the petition shall stand dismissed for default without further reference
to the Court.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Tauseef
Checking your session…