Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KALYAN DHONDIRAM DHAPATEversusMAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGER AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Kalyan Dhondiram Dhapate, filed writ petition No. 10402 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. The petition remained pending for ten years without any appearance by the petitioner. On 26 March 2026, the court noted the petitioner’s absence and ordered the matter to be placed for dismissal the next day. The petitioner again failed to appear on 27 March 2026, leading the court to infer a lack of interest in prosecuting the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition in default for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear before the court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • default dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13583
                                                       1 of 1                    921-WP.10402.2016




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   921 WRIT PETITION NO. 10402 OF 2016

                                  KALYAN DHONDIRAM DHAPATE
                                             VERSUS
                 MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD THROUGH
                                  ITS MANAGER AND ANOTHER
                                                 ...
                Mr. Santosh S. Dambe, Advocate for the Petitioner is Absent.
                Mr. Ramdas K. Bhakde and Ms. Pooja Tayade, Advocate for Respondent
                No.1.
                                                 ...

                                              CORAM :           SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                              DATE      :       27th MARCH 2026
                P.C.:-

                1.             On 26.03.2026, the following order was passed:-

                         “1.    None appears for the petitioner.

                         2.     Place the matter for dismissal on 27.03.2026.”


                2.             Today also none appears for the Petitioner. It seems that the

                Petitioner is not interested to prosecute this matter. This matter is

                pending since 2016 for admission.

                3.             In view thereof, the present petition is dismissed in default

                for want of prosecution.

                                                         (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)




      Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.