Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Standard Chartered Bank, filed a writ petition seeking relief as a secured creditor. After obtaining physical possession of the subject property under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the bank applied to withdraw the petition. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by the Attorney General's office. The High Court considered the request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, and any pending applications were also dismissed. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition after taking possession of the property under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • SARFAESI Act
  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • secured creditor
  • possession
  • high court

Judgment

                                   bipin prithiani
                                                                        1
                                                                                              43-wp-10413.26.doc

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 10413 OF 2026

                                   Standard Chartered Bank                             …     Petitioner
                                        Versus
                                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                     …     Respondents
                                                                ******
                                   Mr. Shadab Siddiqui i/by Mr. R. L. Motwani for Petitioner.
                                   Mrs. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                                                ******
                                                          CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND
                                                                     SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

BIPIN
DHARMENDER
             Digitally signed by
             BIPIN DHARMENDER
             PRITHIANI
                                                              DATE      : 10th SEPTEMBER 2026
PRITHIANI    Date: 2026.09.10
             17:51:02 +0530




                                   P.C. :

                                   .         The learned counsel for the petitioner-bank (secured
                                   creditor) seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, in the
                                   light of the fact that physical possession of the subject property has
                                   been taken in terms of the order passed by the Competent
                                   Magistrate        under   Section   14   of   the   Securitisation     and
                                   Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
                                   Interest Act, 2002.

                                   2.        The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending
                                   applications, if any, also stand disposed of.



                                       (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                   (MANISH PITALE, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.