Bombay High Court
IKHLAK ISMAIL MODAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Ikhlak Ismail Modak filed Writ Petition No. 105 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 3 March 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief. Consequently, the bench held that the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to pursue the petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
DTG 56-wp105.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 105 OF 2019
Ikhlak Ismail Modak … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 3rd March 2020, neither the
Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even
once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…