Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGERversusRAKHMA ASHOK CHAVAN AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the writ petitions are infructuous and therefore disposed of.

Summary

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two writ petitions in 2015 against respondents Rakhma (wife of Ashok Chavan) and Pramila (wife of Dattu Jagtap). The petitioner argued that the petitions had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The learned counsel submitted that the delay rendered the petitions ineffective. The Court, after considering the submission, agreed that the petitions were infructuous. Consequently, both writ petitions were disposed of without any substantive order on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions filed in 2015 are infructuous due to lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • limitation period
  • procedural law
  • petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25596



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                              WRIT PETITION NO.10502 OF 2015

            United India Insurance Co. Ltd.                … PETITIONER
                     VERSUS
            Rakhma wd/o Ashok Chavan & ors.                … RESPONDENTS
                                          .......
            Mr. V.R. Mundada, Advocate for petitioner
                                          ....…

                                           WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO.10503 OF 2015

            United India Insurance Co. Ltd.                … PETITIONER
                     VERSUS
            Pramila wd/o Dattu Jagtap & ors.         … RESPONDENTS
                                          .......
            Mr. V.R. Mundada, Advocate for petitioner
                                          ....…

                                    CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                    DATE      : 2nd JULY, 2026
            PER COURT :

                        Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by the
            passage of time, the petitions are rendered infructuous. As such,
            both the petitions are disposed of as infructuous.




                                                (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

            fmp/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.