Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGERversusPRAMILA DATTU JAGTAP AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court dismissed the writ petitions as infructuous due to the passage of time.

Summary

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two writ petitions in 2015 against Rakhma (wife of Ashok Chavan) and Pramila (wife of Dattu Jagtap) respectively. The petitions remained pending for over ten years. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the long passage of time rendered the petitions infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in proceeding further due to the delay. Consequently, both writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions filed in 2015 are maintainable after a prolonged lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • delay
  • petition dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25597



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                              WRIT PETITION NO.10502 OF 2015

            United India Insurance Co. Ltd.                … PETITIONER
                     VERSUS
            Rakhma wd/o Ashok Chavan & ors.                … RESPONDENTS
                                          .......
            Mr. V.R. Mundada, Advocate for petitioner
                                          ....…

                                           WITH
                              WRIT PETITION NO.10503 OF 2015

            United India Insurance Co. Ltd.                … PETITIONER
                     VERSUS
            Pramila wd/o Dattu Jagtap & ors.         … RESPONDENTS
                                          .......
            Mr. V.R. Mundada, Advocate for petitioner
                                          ....…

                                    CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                    DATE      : 2nd JULY, 2026
            PER COURT :

                        Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by the
            passage of time, the petitions are rendered infructuous. As such,
            both the petitions are disposed of as infructuous.




                                                (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

            fmp/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.