Bombay High Court
TARMAT LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR JERRY VARGHESE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action no longer subsists.
Summary
The petitioners, Tarmat Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the court that the cause of action for the petition no longer existed. The court accepted this submission and held that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition without further hearing. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the lapse of the cause of action
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- cause of action
- high court
Judgment
DTG 144-Wp.1061.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1061 OF 2019
Tarmat Ltd. & Anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
Ms. Archana Shelar i/b Mr. Avinash Fatangare for Petitioners.
Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) Learned Advocate for Petitioners on instructions submitted that,
as of today, the cause of action for filing Petition does not survive and the
Petition has become infructuous.
2) Disposed off as infructuous.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…