Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURINDERSINGH GYANSINGH ABROL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 3 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Surindersingh Gyansingh Abrol and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel informed the Court that the underlying dispute had been resolved and they wished to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original claim were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after the dispute between the parties has been resolved

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • high court jurisdiction
  • dispute resolution

Judgment

                                                                                             9. WP 1075 of 2019.doc




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2019

                             Surindersingh Gyansingh
                             Abrol and Anr.                                            ...Petitioners

                                        Vs.

                             The State of Maharashtra
                             and 3 Ors.                                                ...Respondents
                                                              *****
                             Mr. Prasad Pathare i/by R. D. Bindra – Advocate for Petitioners
                             Shri Nishigandh Patil – AGP for Respondent-State
                                                              *****
                                               CORAM :           M. S. KARNIK AND
                                                                 S. M. MODAK, JJ.

                                                 DATE     :       08th MAY 2026

                             P. C. :-

                             1.      Learned counsel for the Petitioners on instructions submits that

                             dispute is resolved, he wants to withdraw the petition.

                             2.      Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Writ Petition is disposed of

                             as withdrawn.



                              (S. M. MODAK, J.)                              (M. S. KARNIK, J.)


          Digitally signed
          by SEEMA
SEEMA KSHITIJ
        YELKAR
KSHITIJ Date:
YELKAR 2026.05.08
        13:31:59
          +0530
                             Seema                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.