Bombay High Court
SAVERA MAJUR SAHKARI SANSTHA LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ABDUL AJIJ ABDUL SHAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Savera Majur Sahkari Sanstha Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was to be heard on 10 July 2026, but the petitioner's counsel was absent. The court recorded the absence and, after no representation was made, posted the matter for dismissal. Applying the principle that a petition must be actively prosecuted, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was entered on 17 July 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:29028
1 901-WP-10946-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10946 OF 2015
SAVERA MAJUR SAHKARI SANSTHA LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN
ABDUL AJIJ ABDUL SHAKUR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. P. P. Dawalkar
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Subhash K Sawangikar
…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 17-07-2026
PER COURT:-
1. Recording absence of the counsel for the petitioner on
10.07.2026, the matter was posted for dismissal. Even today,
nobody is present for the petitioner. As such, the writ petition
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE
rrd
Checking your session…