Bombay High Court
RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Rahul Kumar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of State Bank of India and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petition was not pursued further. The court noted the petitioner's non‑prosecution of the matter. Consequently, the bench dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or pursue the case
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2024.01.22
16:22:28 +0530
Trupti 1 28-wp-1096-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1096 OF 2017
Rahul Kumar … Petitioner
V/s.
State Bank of India and Others … Respondents
…….
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Neel Helekar for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
.…...
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &
M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 19 JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
None appears for the Petitioner again. The board is notified in
advance. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Checking your session…