Bombay High Court
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERSversusSAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the petitions stand disposed as the undertaking to add the Wakf Board was accepted.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions (WP No. 10959/2016 and WP No. 10961/2016) challenging certain orders in civil suits. Respondents submitted that the original plaintiff was ready to add the Wakf Board as a party‑defendant in both suits. The court accepted this statement as an undertaking. On that basis, the court found that there was no longer any ground for the writ petitions to continue. Consequently, the writ petitions were disposed of, and any pending civil applications were also ordered to stand disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed on account of the plaintiff’s undertaking to add the Wakf Board as party‑defendant
Subjects
- Wakf Board
- writ petition
- civil application
- disposal
- undertaking
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9120
54 WP No.10959.2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10959 OF 2016
SHAIKH AMIN SHAIKH DIED LRS SHAIKH SALIMABI AMIN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYYAD UMAR SAYYAD USMAN AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar,
Advocate for Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Yunus Basheer Pathan
...
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5489 OF 2020
IN WP/10961/2016
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
….
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 10961 OF 2016
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
Advocate for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 9 : Mr. Ms. Fatema Kazi h/f Mr.
S. S. Kazi
….
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Date : 4th March, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. After hearing the learned counsel for respondents for some
time, he submits that the original plaintiff is ready to add Wakf Board as
54 WP No.10959.2016
-2-
party-defendant in both the suits.
2. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to this
Court. Considering the same, nothing survives in the petition.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. Resultantly, pending
civil application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…