Bombay High Court
DILIP WAMAN MHATREversusRAVI WAMAN MHATRE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The original order must be corrected to reflect the proper appearance of Respondent No.1 and the corrected order uploaded.
Summary
Dilip Waman Mhatre filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petition listed Ravi Waman Mhatre and others as respondents, with Ms. Ankita Rathod of S.K. Legal Associates LLP appearing for Respondent No.3. The court observed that the appearance of Respondent No.1 required correction as per a praecipe filed on 23 June 2026. Consequently, the court ordered that the original order dated 17 June 2026 be corrected to reflect the proper appearance. The corrected order is to be uploaded on the court’s portal. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated; the order merely addressed procedural correction.
Subjects
- order correction
- court procedure
- appearance correction
Judgment
501-wp-11037-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
varsha
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11037 OF 2019
Dilip Waman Mhatre … Petitioner
vs.
Ravi Waman Mhatre and Ors … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Ankita Rathod i/b. S.K. Legal Associates LLP for Respondent
No.3.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 23rd JUNE 2026
ORDER:
1. Not on board. Taken on the production board in view of the
Digitally
signed by
production praecipe submitted on behalf of Respondent No.3.
VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.06.24
14:01:39
+0530 2. This is speaking to the minutes of the order dated 17 th June
2026. The appearance of respondent no.1 be corrected as per the
praecipe dated 23rd June 2026.
3. Original order be corrected and corrected order to be
uploaded.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…