Bombay High Court
SHAKUNTALA BABAN GARJEversusGRAMPANCHAYAT NAHULI THROUGH ITS GRAMSEVAK AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
Shakuntala Baban Garje filed a writ petition (No. 11065 of 2016) against Grampanchayat Nahuli and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, because of the passage of time, no cause of action remained and the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no surviving substantive issue. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could no longer be entertained. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to lapse of time?
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Infructuous
- Limitation
- Petition Disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9127
37 WP No.11065.2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11065 OF 2016
SHAKUNTALA BABAN GARJE
VERSUS
GRAMPANCHAYAT NAHULI THROUGH ITS GRAMSEVAK AND
OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar
AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. D. R. Korde
Advocate for Respondents No. 3 to 7 : Mr. Abhijit S. More
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Date : 4th March, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to
passage of time, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, the
present petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…