Bombay High Court
ARUN RANGNATH SODALKAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE RETURNING OFFICER, GRAMPANCHAYAT, BEED AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The writ petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
Petitioners Arun Rangnath Sodalkar and another filed writ petition No. 11128 of 2014 against the Returning Officer, Grampanchayat, Beed and others. The petition sought relief concerning an election matter, but the petitioners' counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. B. A. Shinde, submitted that the delay rendered the petition ineffective. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in proceeding further. Consequently, the Court held the writ petition to be infructuous and disposed of it without granting any relief.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to lapse of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34215
26 WP11128.2014
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
26 WRIT PETITION NO. 11128 OF 2014
ARUN RANGNATH SODALKAR AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE RETURNING OFFICER, GRAMPANCHAYAT, BEED AND
OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhagwat A. Shinde
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 06.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. B. A. Shinde, learned counsel for the Petitioners
submits that by passage of time the Petition is rendered
infructuous.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…