Bombay High Court
SHRI. ANOOP MAGANLAL PATELversusSANJAY BALKRISHNA GAIKWAD
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief against the respondents. The court examined the case status of the underlying suit and found that it had been disposed on 3 May 2018. Since the suit was already concluded, the writ petitions were deemed infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petitions without granting any relief. No substantive issues were addressed beyond the procedural disposition.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the disposal of the underlying suit on the maintainability of the writ petitions?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- case disposal
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:18396
15-WP-9887-2016.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9887 OF 2016
Swapnil
Anoop Maganlal Patel. … Petitioner
Vs.
Sanjay Balkrishna Gaikwad. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 11182 OF 2016
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 11175 OF 2016
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 18th APRIL 2026
ORDER :
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The case status of the suit is taken out by the court
clerk shows that the suit is disposed of on 3 rd May 2018. The
printout of the case status is taken on record.
3. The writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…