Bombay High Court
BHIKAN KESU TUNDIWALE AND ANOTHERversusSHAIKH KALU SK CHAND
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as there was nothing left to adjudicate after the prior decision of the civil application.
Summary
The petitioners, Bhikan Kesu Tundiwale and another, filed a writ petition challenging a Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 123 of 2015. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Y. P. Pokale, appearing on behalf of Advocate Mr. Sohel E. Siddiqui, submitted that the underlying civil application had already been decided. The Court found that, since the substantive matter was finally resolved, there was no remaining issue for adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as moot. The order disposes of the petition with no further relief granted.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, remains for the petitioners after the underlying civil application has been decided?
Subjects
- writ petition
- mootness
- civil application
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:13557
1 of 1 23-WP.11265.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 WRIT PETITION NO. 11265 OF 2018
BHIKAN KESU TUNDIWALE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
SHAIKH KALU SK CHAND
...
Mr. Y. P. Pokale h/f. Mr. Sohel E. Siddiqui, Advocate for the Petitioner.
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 27th MARCH 2026
P.C.:-
1. Mr. Y. P. Pokale holding for Mr. Sohel E. Siddiqui, learned
Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the matter i.e. Misc. Civil
Application No.123 of 2015 has been already decided. Therefore,
nothing survives in the present petition and same is disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Tauseef
Checking your session…