Bombay High Court
MAROTI RAMRAO CHILLEWAD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Clause 3 of the Government Resolution is discriminatory and violative of Article 14, and the impugned orders are quashed; the petitioners are entitled to the subject‑teacher pay scale and arrears as directed.
Summary
The petitioners, a group of subject teachers of classes 6 to 8, challenged Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016, alleging it was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The High Court examined whether the clause unjustly denied the petitioners the subject‑teacher pay scale and related arrears. It held that the clause indeed contravened the equality principle under Article 14. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned orders and directed the Zilla Parishads to grant the appropriate pay scale to teachers appointed before acquiring the requisite qualification, as well as to those who obtained the qualification during service, with arrears payable within eight weeks. The writ petitions were allowed and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016 is discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution
- Whether teachers appointed as subject teachers of classes 6‑8 are entitled to the subject‑teacher pay scale from the date of appointment
- Whether teachers who acquire the requisite qualification during service are entitled to the pay scale and arrears from the date of qualification
Legislation cited
- Constitution of India — s. Article 14
Subjects
- discrimination
- Article 14
- teacher pay scale
- Zilla Parishad
- arrears
- constitutional law
- service matters
Judgment
*1* 11-wp-11285-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
11 WRIT PETITION NO. 11285 OF 2026
Maroti Ramrao Chillewad And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And
Others
…
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.11767 OF 2026
(Not on board, Upon mentioning Taken on board)
Madhuri Manikrao Munde and Others Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and Others
...
Mr. B. T. Bodkhe and S. B. Solanke, Advocate for the Petitioner
in both petitions
Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondents/State in both petitions
Mr. Laxman H. Kawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in
both petitions
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C. :-
1. Indisputably, the issue raised in these petitions is squarely
covered by the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition
No.15527 of 20225 and connected matters dated 23.07.2026.
2. For the reasons stated in the said order, we pass the
following order :-
Narwade
*2* 11-wp-11285-2026
:: ORDER ::
(a) We declare that Clause 3 of the Government Resolution
dated 13.10.2016 as discriminatory and violative of Article
14 of the Constitution of India as far as the petitioners are
concerned. As such, the impugned orders passed in cases of
these petitioners are quashed and set aside.
(b) We further direct the respondents Zilla Parishads to
grant the benefit of subject teacher pay scale to those
petitioners who are already working as a subject teacher of
Classes 6 to 8 from the date of appointment on the post of
subject teacher.
(c) We also direct the respondents Zilla Parishads that the
petitioners, who have acquired the said requisite
qualification during their service would be entitled to
subject teacher pay scale from the date of acquiring such
qualification.
(d) We also direct the respondents Zilla Parishads to pay
arrears, if any, to the petitioners from the date of
appointment or date of acquiring qualification as the case
may be, within eight (8) weeks from the date of this order.
Narwade
*3* 11-wp-11285-2026
3. The Writ Petitions are allowed in terms of the above
directions and disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Narwade
Checking your session…