Bombay High Court
NATHURAM APPARAO UBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Nathuram Appar... Ubale, filed a writ petition and, through his advocate, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The learned advocate for the petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court granted the request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without addressing any substantive merits. No further orders were made. The case was closed on the basis of the withdrawal.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner and the court may dismiss it as withdrawn.
Subjects
- withdrawal
- writ petition
- dismissal
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:12252-DB
(1) wp-1133-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1133 OF 2026
NATHURAM APPARAO UBALE (EKNATH UBALE)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…
Mr. Sunny Santosh Khivansara, Advocate for the Petitioner.
…
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 18th MARCH, 2026.
P.C.:-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. The learned Advocate appearing for petitioner, on
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petition.
3. Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
JUDGE
Devendra/March-2026
Checking your session…