Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NANDABAI WALMIK SURASEversusJANARDAN BALA SURASHE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that since the petition had become infructuous, it stands disposed.

Summary

Nandabai Walmik Surase filed a writ petition (No. 11418 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Janardan Bala Surashe and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was nothing left to be adjudicated. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining cause of action or relief to be granted. Consequently, the Court concluded that the petition could not proceed further. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:1802
                                                  1                         985 wp 11418-2021.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                985 WRIT PETITION NO. 11418 OF 2021

                                    NANDABAI WALMIK SURASE
                                            VERSUS
                               JANARDAN BALA SURASHE AND OTHERS

                                              …
             Mr. Pradeep N. Sonpethkar – Advocate for Petitioner
                                              …

                                     CORAM            : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                     DATE             : 17.01.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has

             become infructuous, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the

             present petition.


             2.       In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.



                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE
             Pooja Kale/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.