Bombay High Court
AMOL SUNIL KSHIRSAGAR AND ANOTHERversusDADASAHEB PANDHARINATH DHOLE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed the trial court to decide the Special Civil Suit within six months, without expressing any view on the merits.
Summary
The petitioners, Amol Sunil Kshirsagar and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge confirming a stay order in Special Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021. They sought a direction that the trial court should not allow any third‑party interest and should decide the suit within a fixed time. The High Court, after hearing counsel, did not examine the merits of the underlying civil dispute but ordered the trial court to render its decision within six months from the date of the order. The Court also clarified that the interim relief granted on 13 September 2023 continues only for the purpose of keeping the stay operative. No findings on the substantive issues were recorded, and the petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct the trial court to decide the Special Civil Suit within a stipulated period without deciding the merits
Subjects
- writ petition
- stay order
- civil suit
- interim relief
- direction to trial court
- procedural order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:4567
1 WP / 11502 / 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1038 WRIT PETITION NO. 11502 OF 2023
AMOL SUNIL KSHIRSAGAR AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
DADASAHEB PANDHARINATH DHOLE
...
Advocate for petitioners : Mr. A.V. Hon
Advocate for the respondent : Mr. P.B. Shirsat
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 08 JANUARY 2026
PER COURT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By way of present petition, the petitioners assail the order
dated 17.08.2023 passed below Exhibit – 29 by learned District Judge-
1, Shrigonda in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2022, whereby the order
dated 20.09.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division,
Shrigonda below exhibit - 5 in Special Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021 was
confirmed.
3. By way of an application below Exhibit - 5 present
petitioners sought a prayer that during the pendency of the Special
Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021, the defendant be directed not to create third
party interest. Learned trial Court and the appellate Court had not
considered the same but this Court while issuing notices on
2 WP / 11502 / 2023
13.09.2023, ordered that the stay granted by the appellate Court on
25.08.2023, shall continue to operate until further orders and which is
continued till this date.
4. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that the purpose of the petition would be served, if
the trial Court is directed to decide the suit itself within a stipulated
period.
5. Therefore, without going into the merits of the matter,
present petition is disposed of by directing the trial Court to decide the
Special Civil Suit no. 25 of 2021 within a period of six months from
today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not recorded any
finding on the merits of the matter.
7. The interim relief granted by this Court on 13.09.2023 to
continue till the disposal of Special Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021. The
interim relief is continued only on the ground that the same is operation
since 13.09.2023.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
arp/
Checking your session…