Bombay High Court

ASHOK MISHRILALJI AGRAWAL THROUGH HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER D A AGRAWALversusASHOK KHUSHALSINGH CHAVAN AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as the underlying suit had already been decreed, leaving no surviving issue.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Mishrilalji Agrawal, filed a writ petition (924 WRIT PETITION NO. 11641 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a civil suit (R.C.S. No.153 of 2012). The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the civil suit had already been decreed with costs on 5 May 2022. The court noted that, since the suit was fully decided, there was no remaining issue for the writ petition to address. Consequently, the court held that the petition had no surviving cause of action. The writ petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.

Issues considered

What relief, if any, remains for the petitioner after the decree in R.C.S. No.153 of 2012?

Subjects

writ petition
decree
civil suit
disposal
no surviving issue

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:15914
                                                1 of 1                      924-WP.11641.2017




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               924 WRIT PETITION NO. 11641 OF 2017

                     ASHOK MISHRILALJI AGRAWAL THROUGH HER POWER OF
                                 ATTORNEY HOLDER D A AGRAWAL
                                              VERSUS
                           ASHOK KHUSHALSINGH CHAVAN AND OTHERS
                                                 ...
                Mr. V. M. Maney h/f. Mr. Umesh N. Shete, Advocate for the Petitioner.
                                                 ...

                                        CORAM :          SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                        DATE     :       10th APRIL, 2026
                P.C.:-

                1.        Mr. Maney, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that

                the suit i.e. R.C.S. No.153 of 2012 is already decreed with costs on

                05.05.2022.

                2.        Therefore, nothing survives in the present petition and the

                same is disposed of.

                                                  (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)




      Tauseef

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…