Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITIN RAVINDRANATH PATILversusTHE BHIWANDI CITY POLICE STATION AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Nitin Ravindranath Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Bhiwandi City Police Station and others. The court noted that after 12 February 2018 the petitioner or his counsel made no effort to circulate the petition or appear for hearing. The record showed the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be proceeded with despite the petitioner’s failure to appear or take steps to advance the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                      KSG                                                          34-WP-1165-2017.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 1165 OF 2017

                      Nitin Ravindranath Patil                                    … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      The Bhiwandi City Police Station & Ors                      … Respondents
                                          _______________________________________

         Digitally
         signed by
                      None for the Petitioner.
KIRAN    KIRAN

SANJAY
         SANJAY
         GHUGE
         Date:
                      Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
GHUGE    2026.04.27
         12:59:51
         +0530                        _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)              None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 12th February, 2018, Petitioner

                      and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                      for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                   ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.