Bombay High Court

POLACHAND AMBARSINGH RAJPUT AND ANOTHERversusNATTU SANDU LANDAGE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the parties settled the dispute.

Summary

The petitioners, Polachand Ambarsingh Rajput and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Nattu Sandu Landage. Both sides were represented by counsel, with the petitioners' advocates being S. D. Tele and Shivprasad G. Jadhavar, and the respondent's advocates S. M. Gunjkar and S. R. Deshpande. During the hearing, the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement of the dispute. The court noted that, as a result of the settlement, there was no longer any live controversy for the court to adjudicate. Consequently, the writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of. The order was pronounced by Justice Siddheswar S. Thombre on 12 February 2026.

Subjects

settlement
writ petition
infructuous
disposal
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:6333


                                                1                   48-WP-11915-21.odt


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 11915 OF 2021

                        POLACHAND AMBARSINGH RAJPUT AND ANOTHER
                                               VERSUS
                                     NATTU SANDU LANDAGE
                                                 ...
              Mr. S. D. Tele h/f Mr. Shivprasad G. Jadhavar, Advocate for the
              Petitioners
              Mr. S. M. Gunjkar, h/f Mr. S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent
                                                 ...

                                   CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                     Date : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2026

              PER COURT :

              1.          Learned counsel for both the parties submits that as the

              parties have settled the dispute, nothing survives in the present

              petition.

              2.          Writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.



                                             (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)




              SVH

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…